Skip to main content

Enriching bitHound with Snyk

Written by

July 27, 2016

0 mins read

Dependencies are extremely powerful, but also open up a world of complexity. To successfully secure these packages in your application, you need to consider security as a natural aspect of quality. This means embedding it into your suite of quality tools and practices, making handling security the default.

With that goal in mind, I’m excited to announce today we partnered with bitHound, a powerful tool for improving Node.js application quality, to integrate Snyk’s testing in!bitHound is the perfect solution for software development teams managing the complexities and urgencies of delivering great software. bitHound continually analyzes all aspects of your JavaScript projects, alerting you and your team when an issue or priority requires your attention.

Security advisories interface showing high-severity Directory Traversal and Regular Expression Denial of Service vulnerabilities.

Snyk-based vulnerable dependencies information inside bitHound

Surfacing vulnerable dependencies is a clear and high priority component in these alerts. Once found, you can use Snyk’s powerful remediation to understand and quickly remediate the security flaws you find, keeping you secure without breaking your stride.

Go ahead, test your application with bitHound today!

Read more

blog feature snyk container custom base recommendations
Blog

Introducing Evo Agentic AppSec: Security That Keeps Up With AI Development

AI-driven development is outpacing traditional security workflows. Snyk’s Agentic AppSec uses security agents to find, fix, and verify vulnerabilities continuously, while humans set the bar.

blog feature ai violet
Blog

VulnBump: Can AI Agents Fix Vulnerable Dependencies Without Breaking the Build?

VulnBump tests AI agents on 307 real dependency upgrades. A fix counts only if the vulnerability is gone and the build and tests stay green.

Blog

Frontier models found the vulnerabilities. Only the attacker found the chains.

Static analysis found the flaws, but only live attack testing proved how they could be chained into breaches. A comparison of Evo COS, Claude Security, and Claude Code Security.