DAST in CI/CD Pipelines: Integration Strategies and Best Practices

Key takeaways

• Dast’s critical role in CI/CD pipelines: DAST is a black-box method that finds runtime vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS in live, deployed applications, complementing SAST. It is an indispensable layer of defense for modern CI/CD pipelines.

• Optimal integration: DAST scans should be executed against staging or pre-production environments after the build and deployment phases. Best practices include automating scans on every deployment and configuring authentication to test protected areas of the application accurately.

• Key integration challenges: The two main challenges are high false-positive rates and long scan times, which can lead to alert fatigue and pipeline bottlenecks. These can be managed by tuning DAST tools to match application logic and optimizing the scan scope, delta scanning, and frequency.

• Effective strategy: DAST should be combined with other security methods like SAST, SCA, and IAST to achieve comprehensive security coverage. It is also crucial to establish clear security metrics and invest in training development teams to interpret and remediate findings efficiently.

• How Snyk helps: Snyk provides a comprehensive, developer-first security platform, including the AI-powered Snyk API & Web for DAST, which integrates natively with major CI/CD platforms. Its intelligent prioritization reduces false positives and delivers actionable fix advice directly to developers by leveraging SAST and DAST, turning vulnerability detection into rapid remediation.

Compete in Fetch the Flag 2026!

Test your skills, solve the challenges, and dominate the leaderboard. Join us from 12 PM ET Feb 12 to 12 PM ET Feb 13 for the ultimate CTF event.

Register today

Understanding DAST and its critical role in modern pipelines

In our fast-paced DevSecOps world of security automation, we see Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) as an indispensable layer of defense. DAST is a black-box testing methodology that analyzes running applications from an external perspective, simulating exactly how real attackers would probe for weaknesses. Unlike Static Application Security Testing (SAST), which scans source code before compilation, DAST operates on deployed, live applications, hitting endpoints, submitting forms, and navigating workflows the way users and adversaries do.

This distinction is critical. While SAST excels at catching code-level flaws early in the development process, it cannot detect runtime vulnerabilities that emerge only when the application is fully assembled and interacting with databases, APIs, authentication systems, and third-party services. DAST fills this gap perfectly, identifying SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), authentication bypass vulnerabilities, and configuration weaknesses that exist only in the runtime environment.

For modern Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, DAST has become essential. The shift-left security principle emphasizes proactive vulnerability detection, and DAST enables this by automatically scanning applications at every stage of the delivery process.

Key advantages of DAST for CI/CD pipelines:

• Real-time vulnerability detection in running applications that catches issues that SAST and manual reviews cannot see

• Identification of runtime and environment-specific issues, such as misconfigurations, authentication flaws, and integration problems

• Simulation of external attacker perspectives without requiring access to source code or internal architecture

• Comprehensive coverage of web applications and APIs, including support for importing API definitions like Swagger/OpenAPI to systematically test REST and SOAP endpoints

• Compliance-ready reporting that helps organizations meet requirements for PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and other regulatory frameworks

Today's cloud-native DAST solutions like Snyk API & Web integrate directly into CI/CD pipelines, running automatically with every code commit, build, or deployment. This continuous, automated approach transforms DAST from a periodic audit exercise into a core component of your security posture.

Embedding DAST into Your CI/CD workflow: Best practices

When we talk about integrating Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) into CI/CD, the key is understanding its unique nature. Unlike SAST, which analyzes static code, DAST requires a fully deployed, running application. This means DAST scans typically provide maximum value when executed against staging or pre-production environments where applications are assembled, configured, and operational but not yet exposed to real users.

In a typical CI/CD flow, build → test → staging → production, DAST fits naturally after the build and deployment phases. Once your application container, microservice, or web app is deployed to a test environment, DAST can begin its automated reconnaissance, crawling the application, testing input validation, probing authentication mechanisms, and simulating attack vectors.

Platform-specific integration approaches

Different CI/CD platforms offer varying levels of native support for DAST integration. Here is how the major platforms stack up:

Each platform supports both plugin-based integrations and CLI/API-triggered scans, giving teams flexibility to choose the approach that best fits their existing workflows and toolchains. Integration strategies typically involve configuring authentication tokens, defining scan parameters (target URLs, scan depth, severity thresholds), and establishing result management workflows.

Automating DAST scan in GitHub actions

Here is a straightforward example of how to configure DAST in a GitLab CI/CD pipeline using .gitlab-ci.yml:

# Include GitLab's DAST template for web application scanning include: - template: DAST.gitlab-ci.yml

# Define variables for DAST configuration variables: DAST_WEBSITE: "https://staging.yourapp.com" # Target application URL DAST_FULL_SCAN_ENABLED: "true" # Enable comprehensive scanning DAST_AUTH_URL: "https://staging.yourapp.com/login" # Authentication endpoint DAST_USERNAME: "${DAST_USERNAME}" # Stored in GitLab CI/CD variables DAST_PASSWORD: "${DAST_PASSWORD}" # Stored securely as masked variable

# DAST scan stage runs after deployment to staging dast: stage: test only: - staging # Trigger scans only on staging branch deployments

This configuration automatically triggers a DAST scan whenever code is deployed to the staging environment, authenticates using stored credentials, and generates a security report visible in GitLab's security dashboard.

Best practices for seamless DAST integration

To maximize the effectiveness of DAST in your CI/CD pipeline, we recommend following these proven practices:

• Trigger DAST scans automatically on every deployment to staging to ensure continuous security validation without manual intervention

• Configure authentication and session handling for accurate scanning, enabling DAST tools to test protected areas of your application that require login

• Set up feedback mechanisms that route findings directly to developers through integration with ticketing systems, Slack notifications, or merge request comments

• Establish clear vulnerability severity thresholds for build failures, balancing security rigor with development velocity by failing builds only on high or critical findings

Effective integration requires treating security as code, storing pipeline definitions in version control, and providing clear, actionable feedback that empowers developers to remediate issues quickly.

Challenges of running DAST in CI/CD pipelines

False positives

Integrating DAST into CI/CD pipelines often introduces more friction than security. The biggest culprit? False positives. Many DAST tools generate an overwhelming volume of false positives, which not only wastes valuable AppSec and development team time but can also cause critical vulnerabilities to be overlooked in the noise. These false alarms emerge because DAST operates without a deep application context, relying on default configurations and heuristics that may misinterpret complex business logic or legitimate application behavior as security flaws.

The impact on development velocity is significant. When teams encounter multiple false positives, they develop "alert fatigue," leading them to dismiss or deprioritize security findings altogether. This creates a dangerous cycle where real vulnerabilities slip through because the team has learned to distrust the DAST tool's judgment.

DAST scan false positives: Solutions for reducing noise

Organizations can dramatically reduce false positives and improve DAST effectiveness through these practical approaches:

1. Tune and customize DAST tools regularly to match your application architecture, business logic, and technology stack rather than relying on out-of-the-box configurations

2. Implement filtering mechanisms to denylist known false positives based on historical analysis and validation, preventing the same non-issues from appearing in every scan

3. Leverage AI-driven DAST solutions that learn from application behavior, using machine learning to understand normal application patterns and reduce misidentification of legitimate features as vulnerabilities

4. Combine DAST with manual penetration testing for validation, especially for complex business logic scenarios where automated tools struggle to provide definitive answers

5. Establish clear triage processes with defined ownership so security and development teams collaborate efficiently to classify, prioritize, and remediate genuine findings

Managing performance impact

Beyond false positives, scan time represents another major challenge. DAST scans can take hours, even days, for large applications with extensive functionality. This creates bottlenecks in CI/CD pipelines where speed is paramount, and deployment windows are measured in minutes, not hours.

Overcoming these performance challenges requires strategic thinking about scan scope and frequency:

• Optimize scan scope by focusing on critical application paths such as authentication flows, payment processing, and data management features where vulnerabilities pose the highest risk

• Run comprehensive scans on scheduled intervals (nightly or weekly) while executing lighter, targeted scans on every commit to balance thoroughness with pipeline speed

• Use parallel scanning capabilities for large applications, distributing the scan workload across multiple instances to reduce overall scan duration

• Balance scan depth with pipeline timelines, adjusting crawl depth and test coverage based on the deployment context (deeper scans for release candidates, faster scans for feature branches)

The key insight is that DAST does not need to be all-or-nothing. By intelligently varying scan intensity based on context, we can maintain both security rigor and development agility.

Building an effective DAST strategy for CI/CD pipelines

Combine DAST with other security methods

We have learned that the most effective application security programs layer multiple testing methodologies to achieve comprehensive coverage. DAST excels at finding runtime vulnerabilities in deployed applications, but it cannot detect all classes of security flaws. By complementing DAST with Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code-level analysis, Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for open source vulnerability detection, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) for runtime instrumentation, organizations create defense in depth. No single tool catches everything, but together they provide overlapping coverage that dramatically reduces the attack surface.

Why combining SAST and DAST strengthens CI/CD security

Combining DAST with Static Application Security Testing (SAST) enables end-to-end security across the CI/CD pipeline. SAST analyzes source code early, providing an inside-out view of vulnerabilities before applications are built or deployed. DAST complements this by testing running applications in staging or pre-production environments, validating which issues are actually exploitable at runtime. Together, they support a shift-left, validate-right approach that embeds security throughout the delivery lifecycle.

Reducing false positives through cross-validation

False positives are a common challenge with DAST in CI/CD pipelines. Because DAST operates without full application context, it can misinterpret expected behavior as vulnerabilities. Pairing DAST with SAST helps reduce this noise. SAST findings can guide DAST scans toward higher-risk areas, while DAST confirms which static findings are exploitable in real environments. When both techniques identify the same issue, confidence increases and teams can prioritize remediation more effectively, reducing alert fatigue.

Closing gaps from code to runtime

SAST and DAST each have inherent limitations. SAST cannot detect runtime misconfigurations or authentication flaws, while DAST cannot identify insecure coding patterns or hardcoded secrets that never surface at runtime. Used together, they provide continuous visibility from code to deployment, catching issues earlier and validating security where real-world risk exists.

Snyk unifies this approach by combining Snyk Code for AI-powered SAST and Snyk API & Web for intelligent DAST in a single platform. Correlating static and dynamic findings reduces false positives and helps teams move from detection to remediation faster—without slowing CI/CD pipelines.

Establish clear metrics & track DAST KPIs

Data-driven security requires measurable outcomes. Core KPIs include:

• Vulnerability detection rates (how many issues DAST finds per scan)

• Mean time to remediation (MTTR) for security findings

• False positive rates (percentage of flagged issues that are not genuine vulnerabilities)

• Scan completion times.

These metrics enable continuous improvement, helping teams identify whether their DAST configuration is optimized, whether developers are responding efficiently to findings, and whether the tool is providing value or just generating noise.

Train development teams

Security is a shared responsibility, and developers are on the front lines. Organizations can transform their security posture by investing in education that helps developers interpret DAST results, recognize common runtime vulnerability patterns, and implement secure coding practices. When developers understand the "why" behind security findings, they become partners in remediation rather than obstacles to overcome.

Proactive DAST implementation

Start by evaluating your current CI/CD security posture. Where are the gaps? Are runtime vulnerabilities being detected before production? Are your developers receiving actionable feedback? Begin with a pilot integration of DAST on a non-critical application, fine-tune the configuration based on real results, and gradually expand coverage as you build confidence and expertise.

Building a security-first culture requires genuine collaboration between security, development, and operations teams. When everyone shares ownership of application security, when security tools empower rather than obstruct, and when vulnerabilities are caught and fixed as part of the normal development rhythm, security stops being a bottleneck and becomes a competitive advantage.

Secure your CI/CD pipeline with Snyk

We built Snyk to be the comprehensive developer security platform that plugs directly into your existing CI/CD workflow. It's security that works with you, not against you. Our AI-powered platform delivers application security across your entire software development lifecycle with Snyk Code for intelligent SAST, Snyk Open Source for SCA, Snyk Container for image scanning, Snyk IaC for infrastructure security, and Snyk API & Web for comprehensive runtime testing.

What sets Snyk apart is our developer-first approach. We provide actionable remediation guidance right where developers work, integrate natively with Jenkins, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and every major CI/CD platform, and use intelligent prioritization to dramatically reduce false positives and alert fatigue. Security findings include context, fix advice, and pull request automation, turning vulnerability detection into rapid remediation.

Looking to better understand the need for a unified approach to app security testing that combines AI-driven SAST and DAST? Download The Gorilla Guide® To Unified SAST and DAST in the AI Era today.

Compete in Fetch the Flag 2026!

Test your security skills in our Capture the Flag event, February 12–13, 12 PM ET to 12 PM ET.

Register today