One of the fundamental building blocks of software is code quality. Improved software quality is directly linked to high-quality code. The quality of your code correlates with whether or not your app is secure, stable, and reliable. To sustain quality, many development teams embrace techniques like code review, automated testing, and manual testing.
While code review and automated tests are important for producing quality code, they will not uncover all issues in software. Because code reviewers and automated test authors are humans, bugs and security vulnerabilities often find their way into the production environment.
According to the Sate of Cloud Native Application Security Report, misconfiguration and known unpatched vulnerabilities were responsible for the greatest number of security incidents in cloud native environments.
Open source code analysis could prevent half of the problems that often slip through the cracks in production. Rather than putting out fires caused by bad code, a better approach would be to incorporate quality assurance and enforce coding standards early in the software development life cycle using static code analysis.
State of Open Source Security 2022
A look at software supply chain complexity and risk in collaboration with The Linux Foundation.
Static code analysis, also known as static code review, is the process of detecting bad coding style, potential vulnerabilities, and security flaws in a software’s source code without actually running it. Static code analysis will enable your teams to detect code bugs or vulnerabilities that other testing methods and tools, such as manual code reviews and compilers, frequently miss.
The fast feedback loop is a key tenet of the DevOps movement. Static code analysis helps you achieve a quick automated feedback loop for detecting defects that, if left unchecked, could lead to more serious issues.
Next, we’ll discuss why you should integrate static code analysis as part of the software development process.
6 Reasons to Use Open Source Static Code Analysis
When static code analysis is used as part of a DevOps process, the automated review process provides several benefits to development teams.
1. Cost & Time Savings
Source code analysis differs from other testing techniques in that it allows you to identify code errors without actually running the code. The cost of fixing of issues increases exponentially as development progresses from one phase to another. Static code review saves your team time and effort from development to code review and testing. It can also save you millions of dollars in unanticipated costs by allowing you to detect code issues and bugs early when it’s still much cheaper.
2. Improve Code Security
Code security is a major concern for software developers. With almost everything these days being run by software, you must constantly analyze your code for potential vulnerabilities common in modern applications (e.g., insufficient encryption, resource leaks, insecure interfaces, buffer overflows, etc.). Static code analysis automatically checks your code for security flaws as you write it, thus helping to prevent data breaches. By incorporating security into the early stages of development, you can significantly reduce both the cost and risk of downstream security threats.
3. Lower Defect Rate
Static application software testing reduces software defects by detecting code issues and bugs before they make their way into released versions of a software system. Static code review is also useful for preventing structural defects from reoccurring in the future. You can leverage it to implement a defect prevention policy, which eventually reduces code defects throughout the software development life cycle. When developing highly complex, safety- and mission-critical software systems, the ability to detect defects early on is of the utmost importance, as a single flaw can have serious consequences—potentially leading to fatalities, injuries, or system failures.
4. Streamlined Processes
Incorporating static code analysis into DevOps, automated CI/CD workflows reduces code review workloads and frees up developers’ time for other important tasks. It also provides developers with the precise and timely feedback they need to adopt better programming habits, write better code, learn from their mistakes, and avoid similar code issues in the future.
5. Reduces Risk Associated with Complex, Large Codebases
As software systems become vital for delivering real business values, codebases become more complex and rapidly growing. Usually, a large codebase would comprise both new and modified legacy codes. Though modifying and reusing code can lower software development costs, it also raises the risk of bugs, and it is complicated to transfer the code from one location to another.
Many junior engineers, for example, copy code from different websites like StackOverflow without evaluating the effect of the code they’re copying. Static code analysis helps to address this complexity and its associated risk. It allows you to analyze the new and legacy codes before they’re added to a project. Static code analysis offers a means for enforcing development standards across both external and internal development teams.
6. Continuous Improvement
Static code analysis provides early insights into code errors and allows you to identify potential code improvements during a typical development workflow. It helps lower defect rates and enhances the quality of code modifications a developer makes before pushing the code to the source code repository. Further, static code review helps you discover flaws as you code that can be difficult to detect manually. In short, it enables developers to build software without sacrificing quality, speed, and accuracy.
Static code analysis is an effective way to improve code quality and application security, while minimizing code defects at reduced downstream costs and time.
In the following sections, we’ll help you understand the questions you need to ask before choosing a static code analysis tool.
Secure your applications
Try Snyk Code on your personal repositories or use it on any open source projects for free
Static application security testing has progressed significantly. Many modern SAST tools integrate into DevOps and agile workflows and can analyze complex, large codebases. This means better coverage, less confusion, fewer interruptions, and more secure applications.
But not all static code analysis tools offer robust features. For example, some are not environment- or platform-agnostic; and some support a limited set of frameworks and languages.
Choosing a Static Application Security Testing tool depends on a number of factors, including your development environment, security budget, existing tools, frameworks, codebase size, languages, and development workflow. It’s crucial to choose the right static code analysis tool to boost productivity while minimizing developer frustration and additional costs.
Here are some questions to consider when choosing an open source or enterprise tool:
Is the tool developer-first?
Does it support industry coding standards?
Is it paid or free?
How hard is it to set up and use?
How accurate are the results?
Does it offer reporting and alerting functionalities?
Does it support your programming languages?
How actionable and reliable are the analysis results?
Does the tool provide summaries for code and security vulnerabilities?
How well does it integrate with your existing software development processes?
Now let’s explore how to integrate SAST tools into the DevSecOps pipeline.
Making Static Code Analysis Work for You
Most development teams begin by statically analyzing code in the local environment through a manual process. But bottlenecks such as enforcing compliance become apparent over time, especially in an open source project with distributed contributors.
Integrating static application security testing into your entire DevSecOps pipeline is one way to ensure compliance. SAST tools like Snyk Code offer more robust integration through the DevSecOps life cycle and provide the highest levels of coverage you need to identify security risks for OSS containers, libraries, software, and other artifacts that may have open security vulnerabilities.
Before Snyk, our approach to open source was time-consuming and slow. We did many manual checks before releasing some of our products; we use a collection of smaller tools for others.
Our security team evaluated several SAST solutions in the market, and eventually adopted Snyk Code because of its automated remediation, developer-first approach, ease of use, quick deployment, and direct integration with developer tools and workflows like GitHub.
Stuart Larsen, Security Engineer, MongoDB
It’s not enough to statically check code locally; you must also incorporate SAST into your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to perform automated code reviews on your entire app portfolio throughout the pipeline and create sustainable, secure, and safe applications.
Second, you have to choose the right tool. Most SAST tools have poor accuracy and long scan times, eroding developer trust and returning far too many false positives. They’re ineffective and impede speed and agility. When there are too many false positives, teams start paying less attention to alerts.
A reliable modern SAST tool should be developer-friendly, less false-positive, and fast.
Likened to a spell checker for developers, Snyk Code is an open source static code analysis tool that scans for security vulnerabilities 10-50 times faster than other SAST tools, employs semantic analysis to uncover code performance and security bugs, reduces false positives to near-zero levels, makes developers’ efforts more actionable and efficient.
Adopting the right SAST tool and integrating it into your pipeline will help you embed security into your pipelines and protect against vulnerabilities and issues that frequently make their way into production environments.