Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@13.5.9.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Authorization due to the improper handling of the x-middleware-subrequest header. An attacker can bypass authorization checks by sending crafted requests containing this specific header.
Workaround
This can be mitigated by preventing external user requests which contain the x-middleware-subrequest header from reaching your Next.js application.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 12.3.5, 13.5.9, 14.2.25, 15.2.3, 15.3.0-canary.12 or higher.
References
high severity
new
- Vulnerable module: qs
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › qs@6.11.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.22.0.
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › body-parser@1.20.1 › qs@6.11.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.22.0.
Overview
qs is a querystring parser that supports nesting and arrays, with a depth limit.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling via improper enforcement of the arrayLimit option in bracket notation parsing. An attacker can exhaust server memory and cause application unavailability by submitting a large number of bracket notation parameters - like a[]=1&a[]=2 - in a single HTTP request.
PoC
const qs = require('qs');
const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]=');
const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 });
console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100)
Remediation
Upgrade qs to version 6.14.1 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.32.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resolve-routes. An attacker can access internal resources and potentially exfiltrate sensitive information by crafting requests containing user-controlled headers (e.g.,
Location) that are forwarded or interpreted without validation.
Note: This is only exploitable if custom middleware logic is implemented in a self-hosted deployment. The project maintainers recommend using the documented NextResponse.next({request}) to explicitly pass the request object.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.32, 15.4.2-canary.43, 15.4.7 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: body-parser
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › body-parser@1.20.1Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.20.0.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) via the extendedparser and urlencoded functions when the URL encoding process is enabled. An attacker can flood the server with a large number of specially crafted requests.
Remediation
Upgrade body-parser to version 1.20.3 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@13.5.8.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization when using pathname-based checks in middleware for authorization decisions. If i18n configuration is not configured, an attacker can get unintended access to pages one level under the application's root directory.
e.g. https://example.com/foo is accessible. https://example.com/ and https://example.com/foo/bar are not.
Note:
Only self-hosted applications are vulnerable. The vulnerability has been fixed by Vercel on the server side.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 13.5.8, 14.2.15, 15.0.0-canary.177 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.7.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Uncontrolled Recursion through the image optimization feature. An attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption by exploiting this vulnerability.
Workaround
Ensure that the next.config.js file has either images.unoptimized, images.loader or images.loaderFile assigned.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.7, 15.0.0-canary.109 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@13.5.8.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling through the Server Actions process. An attacker can cause the server to hang by constructing requests that leave Server-Actions requests pending until the hosting provider terminates the function execution.
Note:
This is only exploitable if there are no protections against long-running Server Action invocations.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 13.5.8, 14.2.21, 15.1.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: path-to-regexp
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › path-to-regexp@0.1.7Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.20.0.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when including multiple regular expression parameters in a single segment, which will produce the regular expression /^\/([^\/]+?)-([^\/]+?)\/?$/, if two parameters within a single segment are separated by a character other than a / or .. Poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS.
Note:
While the 8.0.0 release has completely eliminated the vulnerable functionality, prior versions that have received the patch to mitigate backtracking may still be vulnerable if custom regular expressions are used. So it is strongly recommended for regular expression input to be controlled to avoid malicious performance degradation in those versions. This behavior is enforced as of version 7.1.0 via the strict option, which returns an error if a dangerous regular expression is detected.
Workaround
This vulnerability can be avoided by using a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a segment, which excludes - and /.
PoC
/a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.
The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.
Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:
regex = /A(B|C+)+D/
This regular expression accomplishes the following:
AThe string must start with the letter 'A'(B|C+)+The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the+matches one or more times). The+at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.DFinally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'
The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD
It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total
The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.
Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.
Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:
- CCC
- CC+C
- C+CC
- C+C+C.
The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.
From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.
| String | Number of C's | Number of steps |
|---|---|---|
| ACCCX | 3 | 38 |
| ACCCCX | 4 | 71 |
| ACCCCCX | 5 | 136 |
| ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX | 14 | 65,553 |
By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.
Remediation
Upgrade path-to-regexp to version 0.1.10, 1.9.0, 3.3.0, 6.3.0, 8.0.0 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: path-to-regexp
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › path-to-regexp@0.1.7Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.21.2.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when including multiple regular expression parameters in a single segment, when the separator is not . (e.g. no /:a-:b). Poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS.
Note:
This issue is caused due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-45296.
Workarounds
This can be mitigated by avoiding using two parameters within a single path segment, when the separator is not . (e.g. no /:a-:b). Alternatively, the regex used for both parameters can be defined to ensure they do not overlap to allow backtracking.
PoC
/a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.
The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.
Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:
regex = /A(B|C+)+D/
This regular expression accomplishes the following:
AThe string must start with the letter 'A'(B|C+)+The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the+matches one or more times). The+at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.DFinally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'
The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD
It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total
The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.
Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.
Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:
- CCC
- CC+C
- C+CC
- C+C+C.
The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.
From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.
| String | Number of C's | Number of steps |
|---|---|---|
| ACCCX | 3 | 38 |
| ACCCCX | 4 | 71 |
| ACCCCCX | 5 | 136 |
| ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX | 14 | 65,553 |
By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.
Remediation
Upgrade path-to-regexp to version 0.1.12 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: cookie
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › cookie@0.5.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.21.1.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the cookie name, path, or domain, which can be used to set unexpected values to other cookie fields.
Workaround
Users who are not able to upgrade to the fixed version should avoid passing untrusted or arbitrary values for the cookie fields and ensure they are set by the application instead of user input.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade cookie to version 0.7.0 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.24.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Race Condition in the Pages Router. An attacker can cause the server to serve incorrect pageProps data instead of the expected HTML content by exploiting a race condition between two requests, one containing the ?__nextDataRequest=1 query parameter and another with the x-now-route-matches header.
Notes:
This is only exploitable if the CDN provider caches a
200 OKresponse even in the absence of explicitcache-controlheaders, enabling a poisoned response to persist and be served to subsequent users;No backend access or privileged escalation is possible through this vulnerability;
Applications hosted on Vercel's platform are not affected by this issue, as the platform does not cache responses based solely on
200 OKstatus without explicitcache-controlheaders.This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2024-46982
Workaround
This can be mitigated by stripping the x-now-route-matches header from all incoming requests at your CDN and setting cache-control: no-store for all responses under risk.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.24, 15.1.6 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.31.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information in the image optimization process, when responses from API routes vary based on request headers such as Cookie or Authorization. An attacker can gain unauthorized access to sensitive image data by exploiting cache key confusion, causing responses intended for authenticated users to be served to unauthorized users.
Note: Exploitation requires a prior authorized request to populate the cache.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.31, 15.4.2-canary.19, 15.4.5 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: express
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.19.2.
Overview
express is a minimalist web framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Open Redirect due to the implementation of URL encoding using encodeurl before passing it to the location header. This can lead to unexpected evaluations of malformed URLs by common redirect allow list implementations in applications, allowing an attacker to bypass a properly implemented allow list and redirect users to malicious sites.
Remediation
Upgrade express to version 4.19.2, 5.0.0-beta.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: micromatch
- Introduced through: lint-staged@13.3.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › lint-staged@13.3.0 › micromatch@4.0.5Remediation: Upgrade to lint-staged@15.2.5.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity due to the use of unsafe pattern configurations that allow greedy matching through the micromatch.braces() function. An attacker can cause the application to hang or slow down by passing a malicious payload that triggers extensive backtracking in regular expression processing.
Remediation
Upgrade micromatch to version 4.0.8 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@13.5.0.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Resource Exhaustion via the cache-control header. An attacker can cause a denial of service to all users requesting the same URL via a CDN by caching empty prefetch responses.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 13.4.20-canary.13 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: postcss
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0 › postcss@8.4.14Remediation: Upgrade to next@13.5.4.
Overview
postcss is a PostCSS is a tool for transforming styles with JS plugins.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation when parsing external Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) with linters using PostCSS. An attacker can cause discrepancies by injecting malicious CSS rules, such as @font-face{ font:(\r/*);}.
This vulnerability is because of an insecure regular expression usage in the RE_BAD_BRACKET variable.
Remediation
Upgrade postcss to version 8.4.31 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: express
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.20.0.
Overview
express is a minimalist web framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting due to improper handling of user input in the response.redirect method. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by passing malicious input to this method.
Note
To exploit this vulnerability, the following conditions are required:
The attacker should be able to control the input to
response.redirect()express must not redirect before the template appears
the browser must not complete redirection before:
the user must click on the link in the template
Remediation
Upgrade express to version 4.20.0, 5.0.0 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.30.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets when running next dev and the project uses the App Router. An attacker can access the source code of client components by exploiting the Cross-site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH) attack when a user visits a malicious link while having the server running locally.
Workarounds
Avoid browsing untrusted websites while running the local development server.
Implement local firewall or proxy rules to block unauthorized WebSocket access to localhost.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.30, 15.2.2 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: next
- Introduced through: next@13.2.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › next@13.2.0Remediation: Upgrade to next@14.2.31.
Overview
next is a react framework.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Source Correlation of Multiple Independent Data in image-optimizer. An attacker can cause arbitrary files to be downloaded with attacker-controlled content and filenames by supplying malicious external image sources.
Note: This is only exploitable if the application is configured to allow external image sources via the images.domains or images.remotePatterns configuration.
Remediation
Upgrade next to version 14.2.31, 15.4.2-canary.19, 15.4.5 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: send
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › send@0.18.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.20.0.
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › serve-static@1.15.0 › send@0.18.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.21.0.
Overview
send is a Better streaming static file server with Range and conditional-GET support
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting due to improper user input sanitization passed to the SendStream.redirect() function, which executes untrusted code. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by manipulating the input parameters to this method.
Note:
Exploiting this vulnerability requires the following:
The attacker needs to control the input to
response.redirect()Express MUST NOT redirect before the template appears
The browser MUST NOT complete redirection before
The user MUST click on the link in the template
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade send to version 0.19.0, 1.1.0 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: serve-static
- Introduced through: express@4.18.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: atomic@Xenfo/atomic#5eafe0b93151d79bb94755bfc9d25e542130054e › express@4.18.2 › serve-static@1.15.0Remediation: Upgrade to express@4.20.0.
Overview
serve-static is a server.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting due to improper sanitization of user input in the redirect function. An attacker can manipulate the redirection process by injecting malicious code into the input.
Note
To exploit this vulnerability, the following conditions are required:
The attacker should be able to control the input to
response.redirect()express must not redirect before the template appears
the browser must not complete redirection before:
the user must click on the link in the template
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade serve-static to version 1.16.0, 2.1.0 or higher.