Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to CRLF Injection via the name configuration configuration option. An attacker can inject arbitrary SMTP commands by supplying carriage return and line feed sequences, enabling unauthorized email sending, sender spoofing, and phishing attacks before authentication occurs.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 8.0.5 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Release

Overview

uri-js is a RFC 3986/3987 compliant, scheme extendable URI/IRI parsing/validating/resolving library for JavaScript.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output via pctDecChars(), which decodes invalid and overlong percent-encoded sequences into ASCII metacharacters. An attacker can craft percent-encoded payloads to bypass platform decoder validation and inject path traversal or CRLF sequences that downstream consumers process without filtering.

Remediation

There is no fixed version for uri-js.

References

• GitHub Issue
• Vulnerable Code

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Symlink Attack via the dir parameter. An attacker can cause files or directories to be written to arbitrary locations by supplying a crafted symbolic link that resolves outside the intended temporary directory.

PoC

const tmp = require('tmp');

const tmpobj = tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': 'evil-dir'});
console.log('File: ', tmpobj.name);

try {
    tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': 'mydir1'});
} catch (err) {
    console.log('test 1:', err.message)
}

try {
    tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': '/foo'});
} catch (err) {
    console.log('test 2:', err.message)
}

try {
    const fs = require('node:fs');
    const resolved = fs.realpathSync('/tmp/evil-dir');
    tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': resolved});
} catch (err) {
    console.log('test 3:', err.message)
}

Remediation

Upgrade tmp to version 0.2.4 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit

Overview

parse-url is an An advanced url parser supporting git urls too.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper detection of protocol, resource, and pathname fields. Exploiting this vulnerability results in bypassing protocol verification.

PoC:

import parseUrl from "parse-url";
import fetch from 'node-fetch';
var parsed=parseUrl("http://nnnn@localhost:808:/?id=xss")
if(parsed.resource=="localhost"){
console.log("internal network access is blocked")
}
else{
   const response = await fetch('http://'+parsed.resource+parsed.pathname);
        console.log(response)
 }

Remediation

Upgrade parse-url to version 8.1.0 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub PR

Overview

elliptic is a fast elliptic-curve cryptography implementation in plain javascript.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation due to the incorrect computation of the byte-length of k value with leading zeros resulting in its truncation. An attacker can obtain the secret key by analyzing both a faulty signature generated by a vulnerable implementation and a correct signature for the same inputs.

Note:

There is a distinct but related issue CVE-2024-48948.

Remediation

There is no fixed version for elliptic.

References

• GitHub Issue
• Herodevs Security Report

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in the isPartialResponse function and the _onData method of SMTPConnection in src/smtp-connection/index.ts, where each continuation line is appended to the same response queue entry and the partial check re-runs str.slice(str.lastIndexOf('\n') + 1) over the whole accumulated string, forcing a full flatten of the V8 rope on every line. An attacker who controls or impersonates the SMTP peer can starve the event loop of the entire Node.js process, halting every other connection, request, and timer in it, and grow memory without bound, by streaming continuation lines such as 220-flood and never sending a completion line. This is reachable during the greeting and EHLO phases before the client authenticates or issues any command, the connection module applies no cap on accumulated reply size or line count, and the existing timers do not help, since greetingTimeout fires into an already starved loop and the inactivity socketTimeout resets on every inbound chunk.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 10.0.10 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in the AUTH mechanism detection of SMTPConnection._actionEHLO in src/smtp-connection/index.ts, where all four patterns contain (?:(\s+|=)[^\n]*\s+|\s+|=) before the mechanism literal, so [^\n]* and the trailing \s+ compete for the same whitespace and the engine tries every partition of the run before failing. An attacker who controls or intercepts the SMTP peer can stall the whole Node.js process, suspending every other request, timer, and connection in it, by answering EHLO with a line such as 250-AUTH followed by a long whitespace run and a token that matches no mechanism. This is reached before authentication on the first EHLO against a server offering no STARTTLS, on the second after a STARTTLS upgrade, or on the first when ignoreTLS is set, and the synchronous stall cannot be interrupted by the socket timeout, with roughly 4,000 whitespace characters already costing tens of seconds per pattern.

Details

Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.

The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.

Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:

regex = /A(B|C+)+D/

This regular expression accomplishes the following:

• A The string must start with the letter 'A'
• (B|C+)+ The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the + matches one or more times). The + at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.
• D Finally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'

The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD

It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total

The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.

Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.

Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:

1. CCC
2. CC+C
3. C+CC
4. C+C+C.

The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.

From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.

By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 10.0.13 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit

Overview

uuid is a RFC4122 (v1, v4, and v5) compliant UUID library.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input due to accepting external output buffers but not rejecting out-of-range writes (small buf or large offset). This inconsistency allows silent partial writes into caller-provided buffers.

PoC

cd /home/StrawHat/uuid
npm ci
npm run build

node --input-type=module -e "
import {v4,v5,v6} from './dist-node/index.js';
const ns='6ba7b810-9dad-11d1-80b4-00c04fd430c8';
for (const [name,fn] of [
  ['v4',()=>v4({},new Uint8Array(8),4)],
  ['v5',()=>v5('x',ns,new Uint8Array(8),4)],
  ['v6',()=>v6({},new Uint8Array(8),4)],
]) {
  try { fn(); console.log(name,'NO_THROW'); }
  catch(e){ console.log(name,'THREW',e.name); }
}"

Remediation

Upgrade uuid to version 11.1.1, 14.0.0 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Release

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime via the makeres function due to improperly deleting keys from the reqs object after execution of callbacks. This behavior causes the keys to remain in the reqs object, which leads to resource exhaustion.

Exploiting this vulnerability results in crashing the node process or in the application crash.

Note: This library is not maintained, and currently, there is no fix for this issue. To overcome this vulnerability, several dependent packages have eliminated the use of this library.

To trigger the memory leak, an attacker would need to have the ability to execute or influence the asynchronous operations that use the inflight module within the application. This typically requires access to the internal workings of the server or application, which is not commonly exposed to remote users. Therefore, “Attack vector” is marked as “Local”.

PoC

const inflight = require('inflight');

function testInflight() {
  let i = 0;
  function scheduleNext() {
    let key = `key-${i++}`;
    const callback = () => {
    };
    for (let j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
      inflight(key, callback);
    }

    setImmediate(scheduleNext);
  }


  if (i % 100 === 0) {
    console.log(process.memoryUsage());
  }

  scheduleNext();
}

testInflight();

Remediation

There is no fixed version for inflight.

References

• GitHub Issue
• GitHub PR

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Certificate Validation due to the use of rejectUnauthorized: false in the internal HTTPS client, which disables TLS certificate verification during OAuth2 token retrieval. An attacker can intercept sensitive OAuth2 credentials and tokens by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack on the HTTPS connection.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 8.0.8 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Certificate Validation via the DNS cache in src/shared/index.ts, where the TLS server name (SNI) is stored alongside resolved addresses and keyed only by hostname. When two transports in the same process connect to the same host with different tls.servername values, the second transport inherits the server name cached by the first, sends it as SNI, and verifies the peer certificate against it. This allows an attacker to present a certificate issued for the first transport's server name to the second transport's connection, effectively bypassing certificate validation and enabling a MitM attack that exposes credentials sent to the wrong endpoint.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 10.0.2 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in the parseHeaders method of MessageParser in src/dkim/message-parser.ts, whose unfold loop appends each continuation line onto the preceding one and then re-tests the anchored /^[ \t]/ against the growing merged line, forcing a full flatten of the accumulated rope on every iteration. A user who can influence the size of a header that folds into many continuation lines, most readily a large recipient list but equally a long Subject, References, or custom header, can starve the event loop of the single threaded sending process for seconds on every signed message, halting all other work in it. This requires DKIM signing to be enabled, and nothing bounds the input, since checkHeaders buffers the header block until the terminator and the signer's MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE and cacheTreshold apply to the body stream rather than the headers, while the MIME composer folds the value deterministically at column 76 so the line count scales with the supplied size.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 10.0.10 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resolveContent() method in lib/mailer/mail-message.js. An attacker can read local files or trigger outbound URL fetches by supplying html or attachment content that is resolved through the legacy mail.resolveContent(data, key, callback) signature. When a plugin or application calls this API on a message created with disableFileAccess or disableUrlAccess, the access policy is dropped and the content resolver reaches fs.createReadStream() or nmfetch(), exposing server files or causing SSRF.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 9.1.1 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Commit
• Maintainer's Advisory

Overview

bootstrap is a popular front-end framework for faster and easier web development.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting through the data-loading-text attribute in the button component. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript code by injecting malicious scripts into this attribute.

Note:

This vulnerability is under active investigation and it may be updated with further details.

PoC

<input 
  id="firstName" 
  type="text" 
  value="<script>alert('XSS Input Success')</script><span>Loading XSS</span>"
/>
<button
  class="btn btn-primary input-test"
  data-loading-text="<span>I'm Loading</span>"
  type="button"
>
  Click Me
</button>

<script>
$(function () {
  $('.input-test').click(function () {
    var inputValue = $('#firstName').val();
    $(this).data('loadingText', inputValue);
    $(this).button('loading', inputValue);
  });
});
</script>

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

• Web servers
• Application servers
• Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

• Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
• Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
• Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
• Redirect invalid requests.
• Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
• Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
• Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade bootstrap to version 4.0.0 or higher.

References

• Affected Component
• PoC
• Security Advisory

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Open Redirect due to missing verification of requested URLs. It allowed a victim to be redirected to a UNIX socket.

Remediation

Upgrade got to version 11.8.5, 12.1.0 or higher.

References

• GitHub Diff
• GitHub PR

Overview

parse-url is an An advanced url parser supporting git urls too.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to improper sanitization of special characters for ASCII that start with \x and also for all Unicodes start with \u.

PoC:

const http = require("http");
const parseUrl = require("parse-url");
const url =  parseUrl('jav\u000Dascript://%0aalert(1)');
console.log(url)
const server = http.createServer((request, response) => {
    response.writeHead(200);
    if (url.scheme !== "javascript" && url.scheme !== null) {
        response.end("<a href=\'" + url.href + "\'>Wowww!</a>" );
    }
    else{
        response.end("Nooo!");
    }
});
server.listen(80, "127.0.0.1",function(){
    console.log("http://"+this.address().address+":"+this.address().port);
});

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

• Web servers
• Application servers
• Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

• Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
• Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
• Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
• Redirect invalid requests.
• Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
• Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
• Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade parse-url to version 6.0.1 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub PR

Overview

parse-url is an An advanced url parser supporting git urls too.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to improper sanitization of special ASCII characters that start with \r\r or \r. This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-2217.

PoC:

const http = require("http");
const parseUrl = require("parse-url");
const url =  parseUrl('jav\r\r\rascript://%0aalert(1)');
console.log(url)
const server = http.createServer((request, response) => {
    response.writeHead(200);
    if (url.scheme !== "javascript" && url.scheme !== null) {
        response.end("<a href=\'" + url.href + "\'>Wowww!</a>" );
    }
    else{
        response.end("Nooo!");
    }
});
server.listen(80, "127.0.0.1",function(){
    console.log("http://"+this.address().address+":"+this.address().port);
});

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

• Web servers
• Application servers
• Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

• Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
• Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
• Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
• Redirect invalid requests.
• Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
• Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
• Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade parse-url to version 6.0.1 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit

Overview

nodemailer is an Easy as cake e-mail sending from your Node.js applications

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Authorization in the jsonTransport message, which fails to enforce file and URL access restrictions during message normalization. An attacker can access local files or trigger outbound HTTP requests by supplying crafted message content fields such as attachment path or text.href.

Remediation

Upgrade nodemailer to version 8.0.9 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit

Overview

uri-js is a RFC 3986/3987 compliant, scheme extendable URI/IRI parsing/validating/resolving library for JavaScript.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Uncaught Exception in the parse() function of src/schemes/mailto.ts, whose to branch calls hfield[1].split(",") directly, while the subject, body, and default branches all route through unescapeComponent(), which short-circuits on a missing value. An attacker can crash the process by supplying a mailto URI whose query carries a bare to token with no =value, such as mailto:?to, so splitting on = yields a one element array and the undefined second element is dereferenced. This requires the application to pass an attacker-influenced string to URI.parse(), URI.resolve(), URI.normalize(), or URI.equal(), none of which wrap the scheme handler in a try/catch, and whether the throw terminates the process or only fails the one request depends on the host's own error handling.

Remediation

There is no fixed version for uri-js.

References

• GitHub Issue

Overview

parse-url is an An advanced url parser supporting git urls too.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to incorrect parsing of URLs. This allows the attacker to craft a malformed URL which can lead to a phishing attack.

const parseUrl = require("parse-url");
const Url = require("url");

const express = require('express');
const app = express();

var url = "https://www.google.com:x@fakesite.com:x";
parsed = parseUrl(url);
console.log("[*]`parse-url` output: ")
console.log(parsed);

parsed2 = Url.parse(url);
console.log("[*]`url` output: ")
console.log(parsed2)

app.get('/', (req, res) => {
    if (parsed.host == "www.google.com") {
        res.send("<a href=\'" + parsed2.href + "\'>CLICK ME!</a>")
    }
})

app.listen(8888,"0.0.0.0");

Remediation

Upgrade parse-url to version 8.1.0 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Commit

Overview

parse-url is an An advanced url parser supporting git urls too.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Information Exposure due to improper validation.

Remediation

Upgrade parse-url to version 6.0.1 or higher.

References

• GitHub Commit
• GitHub PR

MPL-2.0 license

MPL-2.0 license

MPL-2.0 license

Artistic-2.0 license

MPL-2.0 license