Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.

Overview

next is a react framework.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data through the improper handling of the x-nextjs-data header in middleware or proxy redirect responses. An attacker can disrupt access to redirect paths by injecting this header in requests, causing the middleware to generate a redirect response lacking a standard Location header. If a CDN or reverse proxy caches this malformed response without varying on the injected header, subsequent users may receive unusable redirects, resulting in service disruption until the cache is cleared.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by configuring the CDN or reverse proxy to vary its cache key on x-nextjs-data for affected responses.

Remediation

Upgrade next to version 15.5.16, 16.2.5 or higher.

References

• GitHub Release
• GitHub Release
• Maintainer's Advisory

Overview

next is a react framework.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Interpretation Conflict via improper handling of shared cache entries for React Server Component responses. An attacker can cause unintended component payloads to be served to other users by manipulating shared cache behavior through crafted requests.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by ensuring your CDN or reverse proxy keys on the relevant RSC request headers honor Vary, or by disabling shared caching for affected App Router and RSC responses.

Remediation

Upgrade next to version 15.5.16, 16.2.5 or higher.

References

• GitHub Release
• GitHub Release
• Maintainer's Advisory

Overview

next is a react framework.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Weak Hash via collisions in the _rsc cache-busting process. An attacker can manipulate cache entries by crafting requests that cause shared caches to serve incorrect response variants to users. This is only exploitable if deployments rely on shared caches with insufficient response partitioning.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by ensuring intermediary caches correctly honor Vary for RSC-related request headers, or by disabling shared caching for affected RSC responses until a patched release is deployed.

Remediation

Upgrade next to version 15.5.16, 16.2.5 or higher.

References

• GitHub Release
• GitHub Release
• Maintainer's Advisory

Overview

postcss is a PostCSS is a tool for transforming styles with JS plugins.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in CSS Stringify Output. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the affected web page by submitting crafted CSS containing </style> sequences that are not properly escaped when embedded within HTML <style> tags.

PoC

const postcss = require('postcss');

// Parse user CSS and re-stringify for page embedding
const userCSS = 'body { content: "</style><script>alert(1)</script><style>"; }';
const ast = postcss.parse(userCSS);
const output = ast.toResult().css;
const html = `<style>${output}</style>`;

console.log(html);
// <style>body { content: "</style><script>alert(1)</script><style>"; }</style>
//
// Browser: </style> closes the style tag, <script> executes

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

• Web servers
• Application servers
• Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

• Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
• Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
• Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
• Redirect invalid requests.
• Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
• Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
• Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade postcss to version 8.5.10 or higher.

References

• GitHub Advisory
• GitHub Commit
• GitHub Release

Overview

next is a react framework.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in the beforeInteractive process, when untrusted input is embedded without proper escaping. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a user's browser by injecting malicious content into the serialized script.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by not passing untrusted data into beforeInteractive scripts, or by sanitizing or escaping the content before embedding it.

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

• Web servers
• Application servers
• Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

• Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
• Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
• Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
• Redirect invalid requests.
• Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
• Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
• Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade next to version 15.5.16, 16.2.5 or higher.

References

• GitHub Release
• GitHub Release
• Maintainer's Advisory