Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: devalue
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › devalue@4.3.3Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.6.4.
Overview
devalue is a JSON.stringify, but handles cyclical references, repeated references, undefined, regular expressions, dates, Map and Set.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via the parse function. An attacker can manipulate object prototypes or assign array prototype methods to object properties by crafting malicious payloads, potentially leading to property overwrites or bypassing server-side validation.
Details
Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as __proto__, constructor and prototype. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on the Object.prototype are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.
There are two main ways in which the pollution of prototypes occurs:
Unsafe
Objectrecursive mergeProperty definition by path
Unsafe Object recursive merge
The logic of a vulnerable recursive merge function follows the following high-level model:
merge (target, source)
foreach property of source
if property exists and is an object on both the target and the source
merge(target[property], source[property])
else
target[property] = source[property]
When the source object contains a property named __proto__ defined with Object.defineProperty() , the condition that checks if the property exists and is an object on both the target and the source passes and the merge recurses with the target, being the prototype of Object and the source of Object as defined by the attacker. Properties are then copied on the Object prototype.
Clone operations are a special sub-class of unsafe recursive merges, which occur when a recursive merge is conducted on an empty object: merge({},source).
lodash and Hoek are examples of libraries susceptible to recursive merge attacks.
Property definition by path
There are a few JavaScript libraries that use an API to define property values on an object based on a given path. The function that is generally affected contains this signature: theFunction(object, path, value)
If the attacker can control the value of “path”, they can set this value to __proto__.myValue. myValue is then assigned to the prototype of the class of the object.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which Prototype Pollution can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Short description |
|---|---|---|
| Denial of service (DoS) | Client | This is the most likely attack. DoS occurs when Object holds generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations (for example, toString and valueOf). The attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr and alters its state to an unexpected value such as Int or Object. In this case, the code fails and is likely to cause a denial of service. For example: if an attacker pollutes Object.prototype.toString by defining it as an integer, if the codebase at any point was reliant on someobject.toString() it would fail. |
| Remote Code Execution | Client | Remote code execution is generally only possible in cases where the codebase evaluates a specific attribute of an object, and then executes that evaluation. For example: eval(someobject.someattr). In this case, if the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr they are likely to be able to leverage this in order to execute code. |
| Property Injection | Client | The attacker pollutes properties that the codebase relies on for their informative value, including security properties such as cookies or tokens. For example: if a codebase checks privileges for someuser.isAdmin, then when the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.isAdmin and sets it to equal true, they can then achieve admin privileges. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to a Prototype Pollution attack:
Application server
Web server
Web browser
How to prevent
Freeze the prototype— use
Object.freeze (Object.prototype).Require schema validation of JSON input.
Avoid using unsafe recursive merge functions.
Consider using objects without prototypes (for example,
Object.create(null)), breaking the prototype chain and preventing pollution.As a best practice use
Mapinstead ofObject.
For more information on this vulnerability type:
Arteau, Oliver. “JavaScript prototype pollution attack in NodeJS application.” GitHub, 26 May 2018
Remediation
Upgrade devalue to version 5.3.2 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.16.18.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Storage of File with Sensitive Data Under Web Root due to the exposure of sourcemap files in publicly accessible directories during the build process. An attacker can access and reconstruct server-side source code by making unauthorized HTTP GET requests to the server hosting the website.
Note:
This is only exploitable if sourcemaps are enabled.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 4.16.18, 5.0.8 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: @astrojs/internal-helpers
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/internal-helpers@0.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.13.10.
Overview
@astrojs/internal-helpers is an Internal helpers used by core Astro packages.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the /_image endpoint. An attacker can access internal or unauthorized resources by submitting crafted URLs to the generated image optimization endpoint configured with output: server and utilizing default imageService: compile.
Note:
This was partially fixed by the patch for CVE-2025-58179. That fix blocks http://, https:// and //, but can be bypassed using backslashes (\); the endpoint still issues a server-side fetch.
Remediation
Upgrade @astrojs/internal-helpers to version 0.7.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.15.8.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via a mismatch in path normalization between routing and middleware validation. An attacker can access protected routes by sending requests with URL-encoded path variants that bypass authentication checks.
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.15.8 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.15.5.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the x-forwarded-proto and x-forwarded-port headers due to improper input sanitization when constructing URLs. An attacker can bypass path-based middleware protections, poison caches, or perform server-side requests by manipulating these headers.
Note:
This is also a bypass of the fix for CVE-2025-61925.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.15.5 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.14.3.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') via the X-Forwarded-Host header when using the Astro.url property without validation. An attacker can manipulate output content and potentially cause users to be redirected to malicious sites, allowing login credentials theft by sending crafted headers.
Note:
This is only exploitable if the application is deployed in on-demand/dynamic rendering mode.
In case of using a caching proxy, any page which is cached could persist the malicious value for subsequent users.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.14.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.16.3.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions due to improper URL decoding logic. The pathname validation used for protecting routes decodes the request path only once, allowing double-encoded sequences to bypass path-based authentication checks. An attacker can exploit this by submitting double-encoded URLs to access protected routes such as /admin or /api/internal, enabling unauthorized access to restricted functionality.
Note: There has been an attempt to fix this vulnerability in version 5.15.8 following CVE-2025-64765, but the fix is insufficient.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.16.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: @astrojs/internal-helpers
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/internal-helpers@0.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.13.2.
Overview
@astrojs/internal-helpers is an Internal helpers used by core Astro packages.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the /_image endpoint. An attacker can cause loading of unauthorized third-party images, including potentially malicious SVG files, to be served by bypassing domain restrictions using protocol-relative URLs. This can lead to the execution of arbitrary scripts in the context of the affected site if a user follows a crafted link.
Note: This vulnerability is only exploitable in projects using the @astrojs/node adapter and on-demand rendering.
PoC
- Create a new minimal Astro project (astro@5.13.0).
- Configure it to use the Node adapter (@astrojs/node@9.1.0 — newer versions are not impacted):
// astro.config.mjs
import { defineConfig } from 'astro/config';
import node from '@astrojs/node';
export default defineConfig({
adapter: node({ mode: 'standalone' }),
});
- Build the site by running astro build.
- Run the server, e.g. with astro preview.
- Append /_image?href=//placehold.co/600x400 to the preview URL, e.g. http://localhost:4321/_image?href=//placehold.co/600x400
- The site will serve the image from the unauthorized placehold.co origin.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade @astrojs/internal-helpers to version 0.7.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.16.19.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the /_image endpoint. An attacker can cause loading of unauthorized third-party images, including potentially malicious SVG files, to be served by bypassing domain restrictions using protocol-relative URLs. This can lead to the execution of arbitrary scripts in the context of the affected site if a user follows a crafted link.
Note: This vulnerability is only exploitable in projects using the @astrojs/node adapter and on-demand rendering.
PoC
- Create a new minimal Astro project (astro@5.13.0).
- Configure it to use the Node adapter (@astrojs/node@9.1.0 — newer versions are not impacted):
// astro.config.mjs
import { defineConfig } from 'astro/config';
import node from '@astrojs/node';
export default defineConfig({
adapter: node({ mode: 'standalone' }),
});
- Build the site by running astro build.
- Run the server, e.g. with astro preview.
- Append /_image?href=//placehold.co/600x400 to the preview URL, e.g. http://localhost:4321/_image?href=//placehold.co/600x400
- The site will serve the image from the unauthorized placehold.co origin.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 4.16.19, 5.13.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.15.8.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the /_server-islands/[name] endpoint when handling the e, s and p parameters. An attacker can execute arbitrary scripts in the context of the user's browser by injecting malicious payloads into one of the parameters, which are rendered as a child of a tag whose name is derived from the absolute path of the island file.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.15.8 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: cookie
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › cookie@0.5.0Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.15.12.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the cookie name, path, or domain, which can be used to set unexpected values to other cookie fields.
Workaround
Users who are not able to upgrade to the fixed version should avoid passing untrusted or arbitrary values for the cookie fields and ensure they are set by the application instead of user input.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade cookie to version 0.7.0 or higher.
References
medium severity
new
- Vulnerable module: diff
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › diff@5.2.2Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.16.10.
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-footnote@1.1.2 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-strikethrough@1.0.7 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-table@1.0.7 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-task-list-item@1.0.5 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-footnote@1.1.2 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-factory-label@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-footnote@1.1.2 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-factory-label@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-parse@10.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › micromark-extension-gfm@2.0.3 › micromark-extension-gfm-footnote@1.1.2 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-factory-label@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-factory-label@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/markdown-remark@3.5.0 › remark-gfm@3.0.1 › mdast-util-gfm@2.0.2 › mdast-util-gfm-table@1.0.7 › mdast-util-from-markdown@1.3.1 › micromark@3.2.0 › micromark-core-commonmark@1.1.0 › micromark-util-subtokenize@1.1.0 › uvu@0.5.6 › diff@5.2.2
Overview
diff is a javascript text differencing implementation.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the parsePatch() and applyPatch() functions if the user input passed without sanitisation. An attacker can cause the process to enter an infinite loop and exhaust system memory by providing a patch with filename headers containing \r, \u2028, or \u2029 characters or having control over patch's patch header for application generated patches.
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.
The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.
Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:
regex = /A(B|C+)+D/
This regular expression accomplishes the following:
AThe string must start with the letter 'A'(B|C+)+The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the+matches one or more times). The+at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.DFinally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'
The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD
It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total
The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.
Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.
Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:
- CCC
- CC+C
- C+CC
- C+C+C.
The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.
From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.
| String | Number of C's | Number of steps |
|---|---|---|
| ACCCX | 3 | 38 |
| ACCCCX | 4 | 71 |
| ACCCCCX | 5 | 136 |
| ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX | 14 | 65,553 |
By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.
Remediation
Upgrade diff to version 4.0.4, 5.2.2, 8.0.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: vite
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › vite@4.5.14Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.0.0.
Overview
vite is a Native-ESM powered web dev build tool
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via the server.fs.deny function. An attacker can access restricted files by appending a backslash to the URL when the development server is running on Windows and is explicitly exposed to the network.
Note:
This is only exploitable if the server is explicitly exposed to the network using the command line parameter --host or the config option server.host.
PoC
npm create vite@latest
cd vite-project/
cat "secret" > .env
npm install
npm run dev
curl --request-target /.env\ http://localhost:5173
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade vite to version 5.4.21, 6.4.1, 7.0.8, 7.1.11 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.16.17.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) through the function createOriginCheckMiddleware due to improper validation of the content-type header
PoC
fetch('http://test.example.com', { method: 'POST', credentials: 'include' });
// Pattern 2.2 Blob object without type
fetch('https://test.example.com', {
method: 'POST',
credentials: 'include',
body: new Blob(['a=b'], {}),
});
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 4.16.17 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.16.1.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) through the ViewTransitions component. An attacker can execute arbitrary scripts in the context of the user's browser session by manipulating the DOM elements such as iframe tags with unsanitized name attributes to shadow document.scripts (DOM Clobbering Attack).
Note:
This is only exploitable if the application uses Astro's client-side routing and stores attacker-controlled scriptless HTML elements on the destination pages.
PoC
Consider a web application using Astro as the framework with client-side routing enabled and allowing users to embed certain scriptless HTML elements (e.g., form or iframe). This can be done through a bunch of website's feature that allows users to embed certain script-less HTML (e.g., markdown renderers, web email clients, forums) or via an HTML injection vulnerability in third-party JavaScript loaded on the page.
For PoC website, please refer to: https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-4xgj2d. Clicking the "about" button in the menu will trigger an alert(1) from an attacker-injected form element.
import Header from "../components/Header.astro";
import Footer from "../components/Footer.astro";
import { ViewTransitions } from "astro:transitions";
import "../styles/global.css";
const { pageTitle } = Astro.props;
---
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<link rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml" href="/favicon.svg" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<meta name="generator" content={Astro.generator} />
<title>{pageTitle}</title>
<ViewTransitions />
</head>
<body>
<!--USER INPUT-->
<iframe name="scripts">alert(1)</iframe>
<iframe name="scripts">alert(1)</iframe>
<!--USER INPUT-->
<Header />
<h1>{pageTitle}</h1>
<slot />
<Footer />
<script>
import "../scripts/menu.js";
</script>
</body>
</html>
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 4.16.1 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: @astrojs/internal-helpers
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/internal-helpers@0.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.15.9.
Overview
@astrojs/internal-helpers is an Internal helpers used by core Astro packages.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the isRemoteAllowed function. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser by submitting a crafted SVG image using a data: URL, which is then processed and rendered without proper validation or sanitization.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade @astrojs/internal-helpers to version 0.7.5 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: @astrojs/internal-helpers
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › @astrojs/internal-helpers@0.2.1Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.14.3.
Overview
@astrojs/internal-helpers is an Internal helpers used by core Astro packages.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal via the href parameter in the image optimization endpoint during development mode. An attacker can access arbitrary local image files readable by the Node.js process by sending crafted HTTP requests specifying absolute file paths.
Remediation
Upgrade @astrojs/internal-helpers to version 0.7.4 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.12.2.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to improper user input sanitization and insecure usage of JSON.stringify method in the server-islands.ts component.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 4.12.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: astro
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5Remediation: Upgrade to astro@5.14.3.
Overview
astro is an Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal via the href parameter in the image optimization endpoint during development mode. An attacker can access arbitrary local image files readable by the Node.js process by sending crafted HTTP requests specifying absolute file paths.
Remediation
Upgrade astro to version 5.14.3 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: vite
- Introduced through: astro@3.6.5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: @jceb/astrouno@jceb/astrouno#bf0f315ed04c79fc633b61e27afc12a620ab3503 › astro@3.6.5 › vite@4.5.14Remediation: Upgrade to astro@4.0.0.
Overview
vite is a Native-ESM powered web dev build tool
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal via improper enforcement of server.fs settings. An attacker can access arbitrary HTML files on the server by sending crafted requests to the preview server.
Note:
This is only exploitable if the server is explicitly exposed to the network using the --host flag or the server.host configuration option, and the application uses appType set to 'spa' (default) or 'mpa'.
Remediation
Upgrade vite to version 5.4.20, 6.3.6, 7.0.7, 7.1.5 or higher.