Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: form-data
- Introduced through: request@2.88.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › request@2.88.2 › form-data@2.3.3
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Predictable Value Range from Previous Values via the boundary value, which uses Math.random(). An attacker can manipulate HTTP request boundaries by exploiting predictable values, potentially leading to HTTP parameter pollution.
Remediation
Upgrade form-data to version 2.5.4, 3.0.4, 4.0.4 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: qs
- Introduced through: request@2.88.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › request@2.88.2 › qs@6.5.5
Overview
qs is a querystring parser that supports nesting and arrays, with a depth limit.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling via improper enforcement of the arrayLimit option in bracket notation parsing. An attacker can exhaust server memory and cause application unavailability by submitting a large number of bracket notation parameters - like a[]=1&a[]=2 - in a single HTTP request.
PoC
const qs = require('qs');
const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]=');
const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 });
console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100)
Remediation
Upgrade qs to version 6.14.1 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar-fs
- Introduced through: puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › tar-fs@2.0.0Remediation: Upgrade to puppeteer@18.2.0.
Overview
tar-fs is a filesystem bindings for tar-stream.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') through the exports.extract function. An attacker can manipulate the path of extracted files to write outside the intended directory by crafting a malicious tarball.
Workaround
This vulnerability can be mitigated by using the ignore option to ignore paths like symlinks that are not files/directories.
ignore (_, header) {
// pass files & directories, ignore e.g. symlinks
return header.type !== 'file' && header.type !== 'directory'
}
Details
A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.
Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:
- Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.
st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.
If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.
curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa
Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).
- Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as
Zip-Slip.
One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.
The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:
2018-04-15 22:04:29 ..... 19 19 good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 ..... 20 20 ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys
Remediation
Upgrade tar-fs to version 1.16.5, 2.1.3, 3.0.9 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: tar-fs
- Introduced through: puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › tar-fs@2.0.0Remediation: Upgrade to puppeteer@18.2.0.
Overview
tar-fs is a filesystem bindings for tar-stream.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Symlink Attack via the extraction process of a maliciously crafted tar file. An attacker can overwrite or write unauthorized files outside the intended directory by exploiting the path traversal and link following vulnerabilities.
Remediation
Upgrade tar-fs to version 1.16.4, 2.1.2, 3.0.7 or higher.
References
high severity
new
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2 › serialize-javascript@4.0.0
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling through the serialize function when handling specially crafted array-like objects with a very large length property. An attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and make the application unresponsive by submitting such objects for serialization.
Note: While direct exploitation is difficult, it becomes a high-priority threat if the environment is also vulnerable to prototype pollution or insecure YAML deserialization.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.0.5 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: underscore
- Introduced through: nedb@1.8.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › nedb@1.8.0 › underscore@1.4.4
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › nedb@1.8.0 › binary-search-tree@0.2.5 › underscore@1.4.4
Overview
underscore is a JavaScript's functional programming helper library.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Uncontrolled Recursion through the _.flatten() or _.isEqual() functions that are used without a depth limit. An attacker can cause the application to crash or become unresponsive by supplying deeply nested data structures as input, leading to stack exhaustion.
Workaround
This vulnerability can be mitigated by enforcing a depth limit on data structures created from untrusted input (e.g., limiting nesting to 1000 levels or fewer), or by passing a finite depth limit as the second argument to the _.flatten() function.
Remediation
Upgrade underscore to version 1.13.8 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2 › serialize-javascript@4.0.0
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection. An object like {"foo": /1"/, "bar": "a\"@__R-<UID>-0__@"} would be serialized as {"foo": /1"/, "bar": "a\/1"/}, meaning an attacker could escape out of bar if they controlled both foo and bar and were able to guess the value of <UID>. UID is generated once on startup, is chosen using Math.random() and has a keyspace of roughly 4 billion, so within the realm of an online attack.
PoC
eval('('+ serialize({"foo": /1" + console.log(1)/i, "bar": '"@__R-<UID>-0__@'}) + ')');
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 7.0.3 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: ws
- Introduced through: puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › ws@7.4.6Remediation: Upgrade to puppeteer@18.2.0.
Overview
ws is a simple to use websocket client, server and console for node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) when the number of received headers exceed the server.maxHeadersCount or request.maxHeadersCount threshold.
Workaround
This issue can be mitigating by following these steps:
Reduce the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the
--max-http-header-size=sizeand/or themaxHeaderSizeoptions so that no more headers than theserver.maxHeadersCountlimit can be sent.Set
server.maxHeadersCountto 0 so that no limit is applied.
PoC
const http = require('http');
const WebSocket = require('ws');
const server = http.createServer();
const wss = new WebSocket.Server({ server });
server.listen(function () {
const chars = "!#$%&'*+-.0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz^_`|~".split('');
const headers = {};
let count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < chars.length; i++) {
if (count === 2000) break;
for (let j = 0; j < chars.length; j++) {
const key = chars[i] + chars[j];
headers[key] = 'x';
if (++count === 2000) break;
}
}
headers.Connection = 'Upgrade';
headers.Upgrade = 'websocket';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Key'] = 'dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Version'] = '13';
const request = http.request({
headers: headers,
host: '127.0.0.1',
port: server.address().port
});
request.end();
});
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its intended and legitimate users.
Unlike other vulnerabilities, DoS attacks usually do not aim at breaching security. Rather, they are focused on making websites and services unavailable to genuine users resulting in downtime.
One popular Denial of Service vulnerability is DDoS (a Distributed Denial of Service), an attack that attempts to clog network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines.
When it comes to open source libraries, DoS vulnerabilities allow attackers to trigger such a crash or crippling of the service by using a flaw either in the application code or from the use of open source libraries.
Two common types of DoS vulnerabilities:
High CPU/Memory Consumption- An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to take a disproportionate amount of time to process. For example, commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload.
Crash - An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to crash. For Example, npm
wspackage
Remediation
Upgrade ws to version 5.2.4, 6.2.3, 7.5.10, 8.17.1 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: nedb
- Introduced through: nedb@1.8.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › nedb@1.8.0
Overview
nedb is an embedded persistent or in memory database for Node.js, nw.js, Electron and browsers, 100% JavaScript, no binary dependency.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The library could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a __proto__ or constructor.prototype payload.
PoC by Snyk
const Datastore = require("nedb");
const db = new Datastore();
db.insert({hello: 'world'}, (err) => {
db.update({hello: 'world'}, {$set: {'__proto__.polluted_1': true}}, {}, (err) => {
console.log(({}).polluted_1); // true
});
db.update({hello: 'world'}, {$set: {'constructor.prototype.polluted_2': true}}, {}, (err) => {
console.log(({}).polluted_2); // true
});
});
Details
Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as __proto__, constructor and prototype. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on the Object.prototype are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.
There are two main ways in which the pollution of prototypes occurs:
Unsafe
Objectrecursive mergeProperty definition by path
Unsafe Object recursive merge
The logic of a vulnerable recursive merge function follows the following high-level model:
merge (target, source)
foreach property of source
if property exists and is an object on both the target and the source
merge(target[property], source[property])
else
target[property] = source[property]
When the source object contains a property named __proto__ defined with Object.defineProperty() , the condition that checks if the property exists and is an object on both the target and the source passes and the merge recurses with the target, being the prototype of Object and the source of Object as defined by the attacker. Properties are then copied on the Object prototype.
Clone operations are a special sub-class of unsafe recursive merges, which occur when a recursive merge is conducted on an empty object: merge({},source).
lodash and Hoek are examples of libraries susceptible to recursive merge attacks.
Property definition by path
There are a few JavaScript libraries that use an API to define property values on an object based on a given path. The function that is generally affected contains this signature: theFunction(object, path, value)
If the attacker can control the value of “path”, they can set this value to __proto__.myValue. myValue is then assigned to the prototype of the class of the object.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which Prototype Pollution can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Short description |
|---|---|---|
| Denial of service (DoS) | Client | This is the most likely attack. DoS occurs when Object holds generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations (for example, toString and valueOf). The attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr and alters its state to an unexpected value such as Int or Object. In this case, the code fails and is likely to cause a denial of service. For example: if an attacker pollutes Object.prototype.toString by defining it as an integer, if the codebase at any point was reliant on someobject.toString() it would fail. |
| Remote Code Execution | Client | Remote code execution is generally only possible in cases where the codebase evaluates a specific attribute of an object, and then executes that evaluation. For example: eval(someobject.someattr). In this case, if the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr they are likely to be able to leverage this in order to execute code. |
| Property Injection | Client | The attacker pollutes properties that the codebase relies on for their informative value, including security properties such as cookies or tokens. For example: if a codebase checks privileges for someuser.isAdmin, then when the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.isAdmin and sets it to equal true, they can then achieve admin privileges. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to a Prototype Pollution attack:
Application server
Web server
Web browser
How to prevent
Freeze the prototype— use
Object.freeze (Object.prototype).Require schema validation of JSON input.
Avoid using unsafe recursive merge functions.
Consider using objects without prototypes (for example,
Object.create(null)), breaking the prototype chain and preventing pollution.As a best practice use
Mapinstead ofObject.
For more information on this vulnerability type:
Arteau, Olivier. “JavaScript prototype pollution attack in NodeJS application.” GitHub, 26 May 2018
Remediation
There is no fixed version for nedb.
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: node-fetch
- Introduced through: puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › node-fetch@2.6.1Remediation: Upgrade to puppeteer@13.1.2.
Overview
node-fetch is a light-weight module that brings window.fetch to node.js
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Information Exposure when fetching a remote url with Cookie, if it get a Location response header, it will follow that url and try to fetch that url with provided cookie. This can lead to forwarding secure headers to 3th party.
Remediation
Upgrade node-fetch to version 2.6.7, 3.1.1 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: request
- Introduced through: request@2.88.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › request@2.88.2
Overview
request is a simplified http request client.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient checks in the lib/redirect.js file by allowing insecure redirects in the default configuration, via an attacker-controller server that does a cross-protocol redirect (HTTP to HTTPS, or HTTPS to HTTP).
NOTE: request package has been deprecated, so a fix is not expected. See https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142.
Remediation
A fix was pushed into the master branch but not yet published.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tough-cookie
- Introduced through: request@2.88.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › request@2.88.2 › tough-cookie@2.5.0
Overview
tough-cookie is a RFC6265 Cookies and CookieJar module for Node.js.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution due to improper handling of Cookies when using CookieJar in rejectPublicSuffixes=false mode. Due to an issue with the manner in which the objects are initialized, an attacker can expose or modify a limited amount of property information on those objects. There is no impact to availability.
PoC
// PoC.js
async function main(){
var tough = require("tough-cookie");
var cookiejar = new tough.CookieJar(undefined,{rejectPublicSuffixes:false});
// Exploit cookie
await cookiejar.setCookie(
"Slonser=polluted; Domain=__proto__; Path=/notauth",
"https://__proto__/admin"
);
// normal cookie
var cookie = await cookiejar.setCookie(
"Auth=Lol; Domain=google.com; Path=/notauth",
"https://google.com/"
);
//Exploit cookie
var a = {};
console.log(a["/notauth"]["Slonser"])
}
main();
Details
Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as __proto__, constructor and prototype. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on the Object.prototype are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.
There are two main ways in which the pollution of prototypes occurs:
Unsafe
Objectrecursive mergeProperty definition by path
Unsafe Object recursive merge
The logic of a vulnerable recursive merge function follows the following high-level model:
merge (target, source)
foreach property of source
if property exists and is an object on both the target and the source
merge(target[property], source[property])
else
target[property] = source[property]
When the source object contains a property named __proto__ defined with Object.defineProperty() , the condition that checks if the property exists and is an object on both the target and the source passes and the merge recurses with the target, being the prototype of Object and the source of Object as defined by the attacker. Properties are then copied on the Object prototype.
Clone operations are a special sub-class of unsafe recursive merges, which occur when a recursive merge is conducted on an empty object: merge({},source).
lodash and Hoek are examples of libraries susceptible to recursive merge attacks.
Property definition by path
There are a few JavaScript libraries that use an API to define property values on an object based on a given path. The function that is generally affected contains this signature: theFunction(object, path, value)
If the attacker can control the value of “path”, they can set this value to __proto__.myValue. myValue is then assigned to the prototype of the class of the object.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which Prototype Pollution can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Short description |
|---|---|---|
| Denial of service (DoS) | Client | This is the most likely attack. DoS occurs when Object holds generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations (for example, toString and valueOf). The attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr and alters its state to an unexpected value such as Int or Object. In this case, the code fails and is likely to cause a denial of service. For example: if an attacker pollutes Object.prototype.toString by defining it as an integer, if the codebase at any point was reliant on someobject.toString() it would fail. |
| Remote Code Execution | Client | Remote code execution is generally only possible in cases where the codebase evaluates a specific attribute of an object, and then executes that evaluation. For example: eval(someobject.someattr). In this case, if the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.someattr they are likely to be able to leverage this in order to execute code. |
| Property Injection | Client | The attacker pollutes properties that the codebase relies on for their informative value, including security properties such as cookies or tokens. For example: if a codebase checks privileges for someuser.isAdmin, then when the attacker pollutes Object.prototype.isAdmin and sets it to equal true, they can then achieve admin privileges. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to a Prototype Pollution attack:
Application server
Web server
Web browser
How to prevent
Freeze the prototype— use
Object.freeze (Object.prototype).Require schema validation of JSON input.
Avoid using unsafe recursive merge functions.
Consider using objects without prototypes (for example,
Object.create(null)), breaking the prototype chain and preventing pollution.As a best practice use
Mapinstead ofObject.
For more information on this vulnerability type:
Arteau, Olivier. “JavaScript prototype pollution attack in NodeJS application.” GitHub, 26 May 2018
Remediation
Upgrade tough-cookie to version 4.1.3 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: inflight
- Introduced through: @rollup/plugin-commonjs@17.1.0 and puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › @rollup/plugin-commonjs@17.1.0 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › rimraf@3.0.2 › glob@7.2.3 › inflight@1.0.6
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime via the makeres function due to improperly deleting keys from the reqs object after execution of callbacks. This behavior causes the keys to remain in the reqs object, which leads to resource exhaustion.
Exploiting this vulnerability results in crashing the node process or in the application crash.
Note: This library is not maintained, and currently, there is no fix for this issue. To overcome this vulnerability, several dependent packages have eliminated the use of this library.
To trigger the memory leak, an attacker would need to have the ability to execute or influence the asynchronous operations that use the inflight module within the application. This typically requires access to the internal workings of the server or application, which is not commonly exposed to remote users. Therefore, “Attack vector” is marked as “Local”.
PoC
const inflight = require('inflight');
function testInflight() {
let i = 0;
function scheduleNext() {
let key = `key-${i++}`;
const callback = () => {
};
for (let j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
inflight(key, callback);
}
setImmediate(scheduleNext);
}
if (i % 100 === 0) {
console.log(process.memoryUsage());
}
scheduleNext();
}
testInflight();
Remediation
There is no fixed version for inflight.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: serialize-javascript
- Introduced through: rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › rollup-plugin-terser@7.0.2 › serialize-javascript@4.0.0
Overview
serialize-javascript is a package to serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to unsanitized URLs. An Attacker can introduce unsafe HTML characters through non-http URLs.
PoC
const serialize = require('serialize-javascript');
let x = serialize({
x: new URL("x:</script>")
});
console.log(x)
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade serialize-javascript to version 6.0.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: underscore
- Introduced through: nedb@1.8.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › nedb@1.8.0 › underscore@1.4.4
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › nedb@1.8.0 › binary-search-tree@0.2.5 › underscore@1.4.4
Overview
underscore is a JavaScript's functional programming helper library.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function, particularly when the variable option is taken from _.templateSettings as it is not sanitized.
PoC
const _ = require('underscore');
_.templateSettings.variable = "a = this.process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch HELLO')";
const t = _.template("")();
Remediation
Upgrade underscore to version 1.13.0-2, 1.12.1 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: svelte
- Introduced through: svelte@3.59.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › svelte@3.59.2Remediation: Upgrade to svelte@5.53.5.
Overview
svelte is a package for building web applications.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the bind:innerText and bind:textContent bindings on contenteditable elements during server-side rendering. An attacker can execute arbitrary scripts in the context of the application by injecting malicious HTML as the initial value when untrusted data is rendered.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade svelte to version 5.53.5 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: svelte
- Introduced through: svelte@3.59.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › svelte@3.59.2Remediation: Upgrade to svelte@4.2.19.
Overview
svelte is a package for building web applications.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) due to a mismatch between attribute value and other string sanitization rules. An attacker can execute scripts by injecting malicious content into an attribute in a <noscript> tag.
PoC
On a vulnerable page that accepts parameters from user input inside <noscript>, like
<script>
import { page } from "$app/stores"
// user input
let href = $page.url.searchParams.get("href") ?? "https://example.com";
</script>
<noscript>
<a href={href}>test</a>
</noscript>
an attacker can pass in scripts via
http://localhost:4173/?href=</noscript><script>alert(123)</script>
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade svelte to version 4.2.19 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: svelte
- Introduced through: svelte@3.59.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › svelte@3.59.2Remediation: Upgrade to svelte@5.51.5.
Overview
svelte is a package for building web applications.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes in server-side rendering when attribute spreading is performed on elements. An attacker can inject unexpected attributes or cause errors in the rendered output by polluting the Object.prototype prior to rendering.
Note:
This is only exploitable if the environment's Object.prototype has already been modified before rendering occurs.
Remediation
Upgrade svelte to version 5.51.5 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar-fs
- Introduced through: puppeteer@10.4.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › puppeteer@10.4.0 › tar-fs@2.0.0Remediation: Upgrade to puppeteer@18.2.0.
Overview
tar-fs is a filesystem bindings for tar-stream.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Symlink Following via the symlink validation process in the inCwd function. An attacker can write files outside the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tarball that contains symlinks starting with the name of the current working directory.
Workaround
This vulnerability can be mitigated by using the ignore option to exclude non-file and non-directory entries during the extraction process.
Remediation
Upgrade tar-fs to version 1.16.6, 2.1.4, 3.1.1 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: svelte
- Introduced through: svelte@3.59.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › svelte@3.59.2Remediation: Upgrade to svelte@5.51.5.
Overview
svelte is a package for building web applications.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the svelte:element tags. An attacker can inject arbitrary HTML into the server-side rendered output by supplying a crafted tag name.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade svelte to version 5.51.5 or higher.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: svelte
- Introduced through: svelte@3.59.2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: sos2021-09@gti-sos/SOS2021-09#b40f37944fbe0abe7fb05f346433550d9452f52e › svelte@3.59.2Remediation: Upgrade to svelte@5.51.5.
Overview
svelte is a package for building web applications.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the spread syntax when rendering attributes from untrusted data during server-side rendering. An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a victim's browser by injecting malicious event handler properties through user-controlled or external data.
Details
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.
This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.
Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.
Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as < and > can be coded as > in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.
The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.
Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:
| Type | Origin | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stored | Server | The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link. |
| Reflected | Server | The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser. |
| DOM-based | Client | The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data. |
| Mutated | The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters. |
Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:
- Web servers
- Application servers
- Web application environments
How to prevent
This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:
- Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
- Convert special characters such as
?,&,/,<,>and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents. - Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
- Redirect invalid requests.
- Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
- Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
- Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.
Remediation
Upgrade svelte to version 5.51.5 or higher.