Vulnerabilities

11 via 11 paths

Dependencies

263

Source

GitHub

Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.

Severity
  • 1
  • 5
  • 4
  • 1
Status
  • 11
  • 0
  • 0

critical severity

Use of Weak Hash

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/common
  • Introduced through: @angular/common@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/common@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/common@20.3.25.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Weak Hash due to the use of a weak 32-bit hash in the HttpTransferCache. When a victim visits a crafted link containing the colliding parameter, the SSR process executes both the search request and the profile request. Due to the hash collision, the search response overwrites the profile response in the TransferState cache.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by configuring HTTP requests to skip transfer caching for sensitive endpoints or by disabling the HTTP transfer cache globally in the application bootstrap configuration.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/common to version 20.3.25, 21.2.17, 22.0.1 or higher.

References

high severity

Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/core
  • Introduced through: @angular/core@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/core@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/core@20.3.25.

Overview

@angular/core is a package that lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It also lets you use HTML as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data via document.getElementById('ng-state'), during client-side SSR hydration, which enables DOM clobbering. An attacker can inject malicious JSON payloads into the application's TransferState cache by introducing a DOM element with a predictable identifier before the legitimate state script is parsed, causing forged API responses to be served to users and leading to the execution of arbitrary scripts, privilege escalation, or UI manipulation.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by sanitizing or prefixing dynamic IDs to prevent user-controlled values from being used directly, or by configuring a unique, non-predictable application ID to change the state element's identifier.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/core to version 20.3.25, 21.2.17, 22.0.1 or higher.

References

high severity
new

Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/platform-server
  • Introduced through: @angular/platform-server@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/platform-server@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/platform-server@20.3.30.

Overview

@angular/platform-server is an Angular - library for using Angular in Node.js

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output via the domino dependency used for server-side rendering, where a vulnerability in the underlying DOM implementation allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into server-rendered HTML. A remote attacker can cause a victim's browser to execute arbitrary JavaScript by supplying input that is processed through the vulnerable domino version during server-side rendering. The fix updates the pinned domino dependency to a patched commit that resolves the underlying flaw.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/platform-server to version 20.3.30, 21.2.22, 22.1.4 or higher.

References

high severity
new

Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/platform-server
  • Introduced through: @angular/platform-server@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/platform-server@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/platform-server@20.3.30.

Overview

@angular/platform-server is an Angular - library for using Angular in Node.js

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the URL resolution process. An attacker can cause requests to be sent to an attacker-controlled origin and exfiltrate sensitive server-side credentials by submitting URLs containing leading Unicode whitespace characters that bypass application-level same-origin checks but are interpreted differently by the server-side URL resolution utility.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by validating and sanitizing input URLs to disallow leading Unicode whitespace characters before performing origin checks or passing them to the HTTP client, and by avoiding sole reliance on origin checks that may be affected by whitespace normalization discrepancies.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/platform-server to version 20.3.30, 21.2.22, 22.1.4 or higher.

References

high severity

Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/common
  • Introduced through: @angular/common@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/common@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/common@20.3.25.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the formatDate function when processing an excessively long or attacker-controlled date format string. An attacker can cause high CPU and memory consumption, leading to application unavailability or browser unresponsiveness by supplying a maliciously crafted format string.

Note: This is only exploitable if the application formats dates using the vulnerable utility or pipe and the format string is customizable or controlled by untrusted user input.

Details

Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.

The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.

Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:

regex = /A(B|C+)+D/

This regular expression accomplishes the following:

  • A The string must start with the letter 'A'
  • (B|C+)+ The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the + matches one or more times). The + at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.
  • D Finally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'

The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD

It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total

The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.

Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.

Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:

  1. CCC
  2. CC+C
  3. C+CC
  4. C+C+C.

The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.

From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.

String Number of C's Number of steps
ACCCX 3 38
ACCCCX 4 71
ACCCCCX 5 136
ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX 14 65,553

By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/common to version 20.3.25, 21.2.17, 22.0.1 or higher.

References

high severity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/common
  • Introduced through: @angular/common@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/common@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/common@20.3.27.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in the HttpTransferCache used for server-side rendering, which builds the transfer-cache key by joining repeated HttpParams values with commas so that distinct parameter shapes produce the same key. An attacker can poison the SSR transfer cache and cause one request's response to be served for another by sending a request whose comma-separated scalar value, such as role=user,admin, serializes identically to a legitimate request built with repeated parameters, such as append('role', 'user').append('role', 'admin'). This affects SSR applications using HttpClient where the same URL is requested with repeated query parameters.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be avoided by disabling the transfer cache for the affected requests with { transferCache: false }, or globally with the withNoHttpTransferCache() provider, which removes the ambiguous cached responses at the cost of the SSR caching optimization.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/common to version 20.3.27, 21.2.19, 22.0.2 or higher.

References

medium severity
new

Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/common
  • Introduced through: @angular/common@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/common@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/common@20.3.28.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information via the HttpTransferCache process. An attacker can access sensitive user-specific information by exploiting a scenario where a child HttpClient delegates requests to a parent client that injects authentication credentials, resulting in authenticated responses being cached and served to unauthorized users. This is only exploitable if all of the following conditions are met: Server-Side Rendering (SSR) with hydration is enabled, a hierarchical HttpClient configuration with withRequestsMadeViaParent() is used, authentication credentials are injected by a parent interceptor, and SSR HTML responses are cached by a shared caching layer (such as a CDN or reverse proxy).

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by attaching authentication credentials directly within the child client, applying explicit cache filters on the child client to exclude sensitive endpoints, or disabling HTTP transfer cache for routes handling user-authenticated data and ensuring SSR responses set appropriate cache-control headers.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/common to version 20.3.28, 21.2.20, 22.1.1 or higher.

References

medium severity

Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

  • Vulnerable module: inflight
  • Introduced through: @nativescript/core@8.9.9

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @nativescript/core@8.9.9 @nativescript/hook@2.0.0 glob@7.2.3 inflight@1.0.6

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime via the makeres function due to improperly deleting keys from the reqs object after execution of callbacks. This behavior causes the keys to remain in the reqs object, which leads to resource exhaustion.

Exploiting this vulnerability results in crashing the node process or in the application crash.

Note: This library is not maintained, and currently, there is no fix for this issue. To overcome this vulnerability, several dependent packages have eliminated the use of this library.

To trigger the memory leak, an attacker would need to have the ability to execute or influence the asynchronous operations that use the inflight module within the application. This typically requires access to the internal workings of the server or application, which is not commonly exposed to remote users. Therefore, “Attack vector” is marked as “Local”.

PoC

const inflight = require('inflight');

function testInflight() {
  let i = 0;
  function scheduleNext() {
    let key = `key-${i++}`;
    const callback = () => {
    };
    for (let j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) {
      inflight(key, callback);
    }

    setImmediate(scheduleNext);
  }


  if (i % 100 === 0) {
    console.log(process.memoryUsage());
  }

  scheduleNext();
}

testInflight();

Remediation

There is no fixed version for inflight.

References

medium severity

Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/platform-server
  • Introduced through: @angular/platform-server@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/platform-server@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/platform-server@20.3.27.

Overview

@angular/platform-server is an Angular - library for using Angular in Node.js

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in the bundled domino DOM serializer, which does not escape text nodes inside the fallback raw-content elements <iframe>, <noembed>, <noframes>, and <noscript> during SSR serialization. An attacker can execute same-origin JavaScript against any visitor to a server-rendered page by supplying data that is bound inside one of those elements and contains a closing tag that ends the element early and opens a script context. This requires the SSR application to bind user-controlled values inside one of those fallback raw-content elements, and the vulnerable serialization path is reached with critical CSS inlining enabled, which is the default.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be avoided by disabling critical CSS inlining, setting inlineCritical: false in the build configuration, which keeps the unescaped fallback raw-content serialization out of the rendered output.

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Type Origin Description
Stored Server The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link.
Reflected Server The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser.
DOM-based Client The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data.
Mutated The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters.

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

  • Web servers
  • Application servers
  • Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

  • Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
  • Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
  • Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
  • Redirect invalid requests.
  • Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
  • Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
  • Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/platform-server to version 20.3.27, 21.2.19, 22.0.7 or higher.

References

medium severity
new

Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

  • Vulnerable module: @angular/core
  • Introduced through: @angular/core@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/core@19.2.25
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/core@20.3.28.

Overview

@angular/core is a package that lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It also lets you use HTML as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via incorrect computation of security contexts for host bindings. The ingestHostBinding function and the sanitizer resolution pipeline fail to evaluate security contexts against the concrete host element, including host directives, inherited directives, dynamically applied directives, and elements supplied via createComponent hostElement, allowing an attacker to inject unsanitized values into security-sensitive properties (such as href or xlink:href on SVG and MathML elements) through Angular host bindings, leading to cross-site scripting.

Details

Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is a code vulnerability that occurs when an attacker “injects” a malicious script into an otherwise trusted website. The injected script gets downloaded and executed by the end user’s browser when the user interacts with the compromised website.

This is done by escaping the context of the web application; the web application then delivers that data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. The browser unknowingly executes malicious script on the client side (through client-side languages; usually JavaScript or HTML) in order to perform actions that are otherwise typically blocked by the browser’s Same Origin Policy.

Injecting malicious code is the most prevalent manner by which XSS is exploited; for this reason, escaping characters in order to prevent this manipulation is the top method for securing code against this vulnerability.

Escaping means that the application is coded to mark key characters, and particularly key characters included in user input, to prevent those characters from being interpreted in a dangerous context. For example, in HTML, < can be coded as &lt; and > can be coded as &gt; in order to be interpreted and displayed as themselves in text, while within the code itself, they are used for HTML tags. If malicious content is injected into an application that escapes special characters and that malicious content uses < and > as HTML tags, those characters are nonetheless not interpreted as HTML tags by the browser if they’ve been correctly escaped in the application code and in this way the attempted attack is diverted.

The most prominent use of XSS is to steal cookies (source: OWASP HttpOnly) and hijack user sessions, but XSS exploits have been used to expose sensitive information, enable access to privileged services and functionality and deliver malware.

Types of attacks

There are a few methods by which XSS can be manipulated:

Type Origin Description
Stored Server The malicious code is inserted in the application (usually as a link) by the attacker. The code is activated every time a user clicks the link.
Reflected Server The attacker delivers a malicious link externally from the vulnerable web site application to a user. When clicked, malicious code is sent to the vulnerable web site, which reflects the attack back to the user’s browser.
DOM-based Client The attacker forces the user’s browser to render a malicious page. The data in the page itself delivers the cross-site scripting data.
Mutated The attacker injects code that appears safe, but is then rewritten and modified by the browser, while parsing the markup. An example is rebalancing unclosed quotation marks or even adding quotation marks to unquoted parameters.

Affected environments

The following environments are susceptible to an XSS attack:

  • Web servers
  • Application servers
  • Web application environments

How to prevent

This section describes the top best practices designed to specifically protect your code:

  • Sanitize data input in an HTTP request before reflecting it back, ensuring all data is validated, filtered or escaped before echoing anything back to the user, such as the values of query parameters during searches.
  • Convert special characters such as ?, &, /, <, > and spaces to their respective HTML or URL encoded equivalents.
  • Give users the option to disable client-side scripts.
  • Redirect invalid requests.
  • Detect simultaneous logins, including those from two separate IP addresses, and invalidate those sessions.
  • Use and enforce a Content Security Policy (source: Wikipedia) to disable any features that might be manipulated for an XSS attack.
  • Read the documentation for any of the libraries referenced in your code to understand which elements allow for embedded HTML.

Remediation

Upgrade @angular/core to version 20.3.28, 21.2.20, 22.1.0 or higher.

References

low severity

Directory Traversal

  • Vulnerable module: @babel/core
  • Introduced through: @angular/localize@19.2.25

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: @ngx-formly/common@formly-js/ng2-formly @angular/localize@19.2.25 @babel/core@7.26.9
    Remediation: Upgrade to @angular/localize@20.3.26.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Directory Traversal via the inputSourceMap function. An attacker can access arbitrary files by crafting malicious input source code containing a #sourceMappingURL comment that references a specific source map file path.

Note:

This is only exploitable if all these conditions are met: the attacker controls the input source code, can read the output source code, and knows the path of the source map file they want to read.

Workaround

This vulnerability can be mitigated by setting inputSourceMap: false in the Babel options or by manually extracting and validating the #sourceMappingURL comment before processing.

Details

A Directory Traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories that are stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and its variations, or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files.

Directory Traversal vulnerabilities can be generally divided into two types:

  • Information Disclosure: Allows the attacker to gain information about the folder structure or read the contents of sensitive files on the system.

st is a module for serving static files on web pages, and contains a vulnerability of this type. In our example, we will serve files from the public route.

If an attacker requests the following URL from our server, it will in turn leak the sensitive private key of the root user.

curl http://localhost:8080/public/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/root/.ssh/id_rsa

Note %2e is the URL encoded version of . (dot).

  • Writing arbitrary files: Allows the attacker to create or replace existing files. This type of vulnerability is also known as Zip-Slip.

One way to achieve this is by using a malicious zip archive that holds path traversal filenames. When each filename in the zip archive gets concatenated to the target extraction folder, without validation, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. If an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily.

The following is an example of a zip archive with one benign file and one malicious file. Extracting the malicious file will result in traversing out of the target folder, ending up in /root/.ssh/ overwriting the authorized_keys file:

2018-04-15 22:04:29 .....           19           19  good.txt
2018-04-15 22:04:42 .....           20           20  ../../../../../../root/.ssh/authorized_keys

Remediation

Upgrade @babel/core to version 7.29.6, 8.0.0-rc.6 or higher.

References