Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.
high severity
- Vulnerable module: setuptools
- Introduced through: setuptools@40.5.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › setuptools@40.5.0Remediation: Upgrade to setuptools@70.0.0.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') through the package_index
module's download functions due to the unsafe usage of os.system
. An attacker can execute arbitrary commands on the system by providing malicious URLs or manipulating the URLs retrieved from package index servers.
Note
Because easy_install
and package_index
are deprecated, the exploitation surface is reduced, but it's conceivable through social engineering or minor compromise to a package index could grant remote access.
Remediation
Upgrade setuptools
to version 70.0.0 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: urllib3
- Introduced through: urllib3@2.0.7 and requests@2.31.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › urllib3@2.0.7Remediation: Upgrade to urllib3@2.2.2.
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › requests@2.31.0 › urllib3@2.0.7Remediation: Upgrade to requests@2.32.0.
Overview
urllib3 is a HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer due to the improper handling of the Proxy-Authorization
header during cross-origin redirects when ProxyManager
is not in use. When the conditions below are met, including non-recommended configurations, the contents of this header can be sent in an automatic HTTP redirect.
Notes:
To be vulnerable, the application must be doing all of the following:
Setting the
Proxy-Authorization
header without using urllib3's built-in proxy support.Not disabling HTTP redirects (e.g. with
redirects=False
)Either not using an HTTPS origin server, or having a proxy or target origin that redirects to a malicious origin.
Workarounds
Using the
Proxy-Authorization
header with urllib3'sProxyManager
.Disabling HTTP redirects using
redirects=False
when sending requests.Not using the
Proxy-Authorization
header.
Remediation
Upgrade urllib3
to version 1.26.19, 2.2.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: setuptools
- Introduced through: setuptools@40.5.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › setuptools@40.5.0Remediation: Upgrade to setuptools@65.5.1.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via crafted HTML package or custom PackageIndex
page.
Note:
Only a small portion of the user base is impacted by this flaw. Setuptools maintainers pointed out that package_index
is deprecated (not formally, but “in spirit”) and the vulnerability isn't reachable through standard, recommended workflows.
Details
Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.
The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.
Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:
regex = /A(B|C+)+D/
This regular expression accomplishes the following:
A
The string must start with the letter 'A'(B|C+)+
The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the+
matches one or more times). The+
at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.D
Finally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'
The expression would match inputs such as ABBD
, ABCCCCD
, ABCBCCCD
and ACCCCCD
It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total
$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total
The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.
Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.
Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:
- CCC
- CC+C
- C+CC
- C+C+C.
The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.
From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.
String | Number of C's | Number of steps |
---|---|---|
ACCCX | 3 | 38 |
ACCCCX | 4 | 71 |
ACCCCCX | 5 | 136 |
ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX | 14 | 65,553 |
By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.
Remediation
Upgrade setuptools
to version 65.5.1 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: requests
- Introduced through: requests@2.31.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › requests@2.31.0Remediation: Upgrade to requests@2.32.2.
Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation when making requests through a Requests Session
. An attacker can bypass certificate verification by making the first request with verify=False
, causing all subsequent requests to ignore certificate verification regardless of changes to the verify
value.
Notes:
For requests <2.32.0, avoid setting
verify=False
for the first request to a host while using a Requests Session.For requests <2.32.0, call
close()
on Session objects to clear existing connections ifverify=False
is used.This vulnerability was initially fixed in version 2.32.0, which was yanked. Therefore, the next available fixed version is 2.32.2.
Remediation
Upgrade requests
to version 2.32.2 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Module: certifi
- Introduced through: requests@2.31.0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: Hackman238/pyExploitDb@Hackman238/pyExploitDb#b76c5e8acd99668499f671b21452b7d1232c4f10 › requests@2.31.0 › certifi@2024.8.30
MPL-2.0 license