Vulnerabilities |
123 via 361 paths |
---|---|
Dependencies |
97 |
Source |
Docker |
Target OS |
debian:9 |
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: dpkg
- Introduced through: dpkg@1.18.25
- Fixed in: 1.18.26
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › dpkg@1.18.25
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream dpkg
package and not the dpkg
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Dpkg::Source::Archive in dpkg, the Debian package management system, before version 1.21.8, 1.20.10, 1.19.8, 1.18.26 is prone to a directory traversal vulnerability. When extracting untrusted source packages in v2 and v3 source package formats that include a debian.tar, the in-place extraction can lead to directory traversal situations on specially crafted orig.tar and debian.tar tarballs.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
dpkg
to version 1.18.26 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1664
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2022/msg00115.html
- https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=faa4c92debe45412bfcf8a44f26e827800bb24be
- https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=7a6c03cb34d4a09f35df2f10779cbf1b70a5200b
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00033.html
- https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=58814cacee39c4ce9e2cd0e3a3b9b57ad437eff5
- https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=1f23dddc17f69c9598477098c7fb9936e15fa495
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221007-0002/
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: lz4/liblz4-1
- Introduced through: lz4/liblz4-1@0.0~r131-2+b1
- Fixed in: 0.0~r131-2+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › lz4/liblz4-1@0.0~r131-2+b1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream lz4
package and not the lz4
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
There's a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling of memmove() on a negative size argument, causing an out-of-bounds write and/or a crash. The greatest impact of this flaw is to availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity as well.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
lz4
to version 0.0~r131-2+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3520
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954559
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211104-0005/
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:2854
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2575
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1345
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5606
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:6407
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3520
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u6
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u6 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1292
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.html
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0011
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
openssl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-2068
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5169
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0008/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA instructions. This issue makes the RSA implementation with 2048 bit private keys incorrect on such machines and memory corruption will happen during the computation. As a consequence of the memory corruption an attacker may be able to trigger a remote code execution on the machine performing the computation. SSL/TLS servers or other servers using 2048 bit RSA private keys running on machines supporting AVX512IFMA instructions of the X86_64 architecture are affected by this issue.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
openssl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-2274
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4d8a88c134df634ba610ff8db1eb8478ac5fd345
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18625
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220715-0010/
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=4d8a88c134df634ba610ff8db1eb8478ac5fd345
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
- Fixed in: 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In shadow before 4.5, the newusers tool could be made to manipulate internal data structures in ways unintended by the authors. Malformed input may lead to crashes (with a buffer overflow or other memory corruption) or other unspecified behaviors. This crosses a privilege boundary in, for example, certain web-hosting environments in which a Control Panel allows an unprivileged user account to create subaccounts.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
shadow
to version 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-12424
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-12424
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756630
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-16
- https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/954e3d2e7113e9ac06632aee3c69b8d818cc8952
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1266675
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00020.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2017-12424
high severity
- Vulnerable module: gzip/gzip
- Introduced through: gzip/gzip@1.6-5+b1
- Fixed in: 1.6-5+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gzip/gzip@1.6-5+b1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gzip
package and not the gzip
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An arbitrary file write vulnerability was found in GNU gzip's zgrep utility. When zgrep is applied on the attacker's chosen file name (for example, a crafted file name), this can overwrite an attacker's content to an arbitrary attacker-selected file. This flaw occurs due to insufficient validation when processing filenames with two or more newlines where selected content and the target file names are embedded in crafted multi-line file names. This flaw allows a remote, low privileged attacker to force zgrep to write arbitrary files on the system.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
gzip
to version 1.6-5+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1271
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073310
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1271
- https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gzip/2022-04/msg00011.html
- https://tukaani.org/xz/xzgrep-ZDI-CAN-16587.patch
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/07/8
- https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=commit;h=69d1b3fc29677af8ade8dc15dba83f0589cb63d6
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-01
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220930-0006/
- https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=69d1b3fc29677af8ade8dc15dba83f0589cb63d6
high severity
- Vulnerable module: xz-utils/liblzma5
- Introduced through: xz-utils/liblzma5@5.2.2-1.2+b1
- Fixed in: 5.2.2-1.2+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › xz-utils/liblzma5@5.2.2-1.2+b1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream xz-utils
package and not the xz-utils
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An arbitrary file write vulnerability was found in GNU gzip's zgrep utility. When zgrep is applied on the attacker's chosen file name (for example, a crafted file name), this can overwrite an attacker's content to an arbitrary attacker-selected file. This flaw occurs due to insufficient validation when processing filenames with two or more newlines where selected content and the target file names are embedded in crafted multi-line file names. This flaw allows a remote, low privileged attacker to force zgrep to write arbitrary files on the system.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
xz-utils
to version 5.2.2-1.2+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1271
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073310
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1271
- https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gzip/2022-04/msg00011.html
- https://tukaani.org/xz/xzgrep-ZDI-CAN-16587.patch
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/07/8
- https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=commit;h=69d1b3fc29677af8ade8dc15dba83f0589cb63d6
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-01
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220930-0006/
- https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=69d1b3fc29677af8ade8dc15dba83f0589cb63d6
high severity
- Vulnerable module: perl/perl-base
- Introduced through: perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
- Fixed in: 5.24.1-3+deb9u7
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream perl
package and not the perl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Perl before 5.30.3 has an integer overflow related to mishandling of a "PL_regkind[OP(n)] == NOTHING" situation. A crafted regular expression could lead to malformed bytecode with a possibility of instruction injection.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
perl
to version 5.24.1-3+deb9u7 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-10878
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/blead/pod/perl5303delta.pod
- https://github.com/perl/perl5/commit/0a320d753fe7fca03df259a4dfd8e641e51edaa8
- https://github.com/perl/perl5/commit/3295b48defa0f8570114877b063fe546dd348b3c
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/compare/v5.30.2...v5.30.3
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200611-0001/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-03
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00044.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-10878
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: perl/perl-base
- Introduced through: perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
- Fixed in: 5.24.1-3+deb9u7
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream perl
package and not the perl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Perl before 5.30.3 on 32-bit platforms allows a heap-based buffer overflow because nested regular expression quantifiers have an integer overflow.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
perl
to version 5.24.1-3+deb9u7 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-10543
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/blead/pod/perl5303delta.pod
- https://github.com/perl/perl5/commit/897d1f7fd515b828e4b198d8b8bef76c6faf03ed
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/compare/v5.30.2...v5.30.3
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200611-0001/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-03
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00044.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-10543
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: gcc-6/gcc-6-base
- Introduced through: gcc-6/gcc-6-base@6.3.0-18+deb9u1, gcc-6/libgcc1@1:6.3.0-18+deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gcc-6/gcc-6-base@6.3.0-18+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gcc-6/libgcc1@1:6.3.0-18+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gcc-6/libstdc++6@6.3.0-18+deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gcc-6
package and not the gcc-6
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
stack_protect_prologue in cfgexpand.c and stack_protect_epilogue in function.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) 4.1 through 8 (under certain circumstances) generate instruction sequences when targeting ARM targets that spill the address of the stack protector guard, which allows an attacker to bypass the protection of -fstack-protector, -fstack-protector-all, -fstack-protector-strong, and -fstack-protector-explicit against stack overflow by controlling what the stack canary is compared against.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
gcc-6
.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
- Fixed in: 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The Debian shadow package before 1:4.5-1 for Shadow incorrectly lists pts/0 and pts/1 as physical terminals in /etc/securetty. This allows local users to login as password-less users even if they are connected by non-physical means such as SSH (hence bypassing PAM's nullok_secure configuration). This notably affects environments such as virtual machines automatically generated with a default blank root password, allowing all local users to escalate privileges.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
shadow
to version 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
- Fixed in: 232-25+deb9u10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A vulnerability in unit_deserialize of systemd allows an attacker to supply arbitrary state across systemd re-execution via NotifyAccess. This can be used to improperly influence systemd execution and possibly lead to root privilege escalation. Affected releases are systemd versions up to and including 239.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
systemd
to version 232-25+deb9u10 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-15686
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00017.html
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45714/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201810-10
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10519
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3222
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0593
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2091
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105747
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-15686
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3816-1/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
high severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
- Fixed in: 232-25+deb9u14
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A heap use-after-free vulnerability was found in systemd before version v245-rc1, where asynchronous Polkit queries are performed while handling dbus messages. A local unprivileged attacker can abuse this flaw to crash systemd services or potentially execute code and elevate their privileges, by sending specially crafted dbus messages.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
systemd
to version 232-25+deb9u14 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-1712
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/1068447e6954dc6ce52f099ed174c442cb89ed54
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/637486261528e8aa3da9f26a4487dc254f4b7abb
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/bc130b6858327b382b07b3985cf48e2aa9016b2d
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/ea0d0ede03c6f18dbc5036c5e9cccf97e415ccc2
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/02/05/1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1712
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-1712
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/06/msg00025.html
high severity
- Vulnerable module: gmp/libgmp-dev
- Introduced through: gmp/libgmp-dev@2:6.1.2+dfsg-1, gmp/libgmp10@2:6.1.2+dfsg-1 and others
- Fixed in: 2:6.1.2+dfsg-1+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gmp/libgmp-dev@2:6.1.2+dfsg-1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gmp/libgmp10@2:6.1.2+dfsg-1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gmp/libgmpxx4ldbl@2:6.1.2+dfsg-1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gmp
package and not the gmp
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library (GMP) through 6.2.1 has an mpz/inp_raw.c integer overflow and resultant buffer overflow via crafted input, leading to a segmentation fault on 32-bit platforms.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
gmp
to version 2:6.1.2+dfsg-1+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-43618
- https://bugs.debian.org/994405
- https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2021-September/005077.html
- https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp-6.2/rev/561a9c25298e
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/12/msg00001.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/13/3
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/8
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221111-0001/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-13
high severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u3 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-23840
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a51b9e1d0cf0bf8515f7201b68fb0a3482b3dc1
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b1129239f3ebb1d1c98ce9ed41d5c9476c47cb2
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-03
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4855
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6a51b9e1d0cf0bf8515f7201b68fb0a3482b3dc1
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9b1129239f3ebb1d1c98ce9ed41d5c9476c47cb2
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
high severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u5 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-0778
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=380085481c64de749a6dd25cdf0bcf4360b30f83
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=a466912611aa6cbdf550cd10601390e587451246
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=3118eb64934499d93db3230748a452351d1d9a65
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00024.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220321-0002/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDB3GQVJPXJE7X5C5JN6JAA4XUDWD6E6/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0002
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-06
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-07
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/323SNN6ZX7PRJJWP2BUAFLPUAE42XWLZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W6K3PR542DXWLEFFMFIDMME4CWMHJRMG/
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-08
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-09
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220429-0005/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213256
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213255
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213257
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167344/OpenSSL-1.0.2-1.1.1-3.0-BN_mod_sqrt-Infinite-Loop.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-712929.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3118eb64934499d93db3230748a452351d1d9a65
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=380085481c64de749a6dd25cdf0bcf4360b30f83
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a466912611aa6cbdf550cd10601390e587451246
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/323SNN6ZX7PRJJWP2BUAFLPUAE42XWLZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDB3GQVJPXJE7X5C5JN6JAA4XUDWD6E6/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W6K3PR542DXWLEFFMFIDMME4CWMHJRMG/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: perl/perl-base
- Introduced through: perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
- Fixed in: 5.24.1-3+deb9u7
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream perl
package and not the perl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
regcomp.c in Perl before 5.30.3 allows a buffer overflow via a crafted regular expression because of recursive S_study_chunk calls.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
perl
to version 5.24.1-3+deb9u7 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-12723
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/blead/pod/perl5303delta.pod
- https://github.com/perl/perl5/commit/66bbb51b93253a3f87d11c2695cfb7bdb782184a
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/compare/v5.30.2...v5.30.3
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200611-0001/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-03
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/16947
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17743
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00044.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-12723
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IN3TTBO5KSGWE5IRIKDJ5JSQRH7ANNXE/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: zlib/zlib1g
- Introduced through: zlib/zlib1g@1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 and zlib/zlib1g-dev@1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
- Fixed in: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › zlib/zlib1g@1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › zlib/zlib1g-dev@1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream zlib
package and not the zlib
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption when deflating (i.e., when compressing) if the input has many distant matches.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
zlib
to version 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-25032
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/24/1
- https://github.com/madler/zlib/commit/5c44459c3b28a9bd3283aaceab7c615f8020c531
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/25/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/26/1
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/28/1
- https://github.com/madler/zlib/compare/v1.2.11...v1.2.12
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/28/3
- https://github.com/madler/zlib/issues/605
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5111
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/04/msg00000.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NS2D2GFPFGOJUL4WQ3DUAY7HF4VWQ77F/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOKFMSNQ5D5WGMALBNBXU3GE442V74WU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VOKNP2L734AEL47NRYGVZIKEFOUBQY5Y/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00008.html
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213255
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213256
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213257
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220526-0009/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DF62MVMH3QUGMBDCB3DY2ERQ6EBHTADB/
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JZZPTWRYQULAOL3AW7RZJNVZ2UONXCV4/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DCZFIJBJTZ7CL5QXBFKTQ22Q26VINRUF/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00023.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-42
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-333517.pdf
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DCZFIJBJTZ7CL5QXBFKTQ22Q26VINRUF/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DF62MVMH3QUGMBDCB3DY2ERQ6EBHTADB/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JZZPTWRYQULAOL3AW7RZJNVZ2UONXCV4/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NS2D2GFPFGOJUL4WQ3DUAY7HF4VWQ77F/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VOKNP2L734AEL47NRYGVZIKEFOUBQY5Y/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOKFMSNQ5D5WGMALBNBXU3GE442V74WU/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u4 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3712
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210827-0010/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-16
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4963
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008fd2a6aca82394249476d21691e7c59c9e@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rad5d9f83f0d11fb3f8bb148d179b8a9ad7c6a17f18d70e5805a713d1@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00014.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00021.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-02
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008fd2a6aca82394249476d21691e7c59c9e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rad5d9f83f0d11fb3f8bb148d179b8a9ad7c6a17f18d70e5805a713d1%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
high severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0k-1~deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. It is a requirement of using this cipher that nonce values are unique. Messages encrypted using a reused nonce value are susceptible to serious confidentiality and integrity attacks. If an application changes the default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes and then makes a change to the leading bytes of the nonce expecting the new value to be a new unique nonce then such an application could inadvertently encrypt messages with a reused nonce. Additionally the ignored bytes in a long nonce are not covered by the integrity guarantee of this cipher. Any application that relies on the integrity of these ignored leading bytes of a long nonce may be further affected. Any OpenSSL internal use of this cipher, including in SSL/TLS, is safe because no such use sets such a long nonce value. However user applications that use this cipher directly and set a non-default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes may be vulnerable. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.0 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1c (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1b). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0k (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0j).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0k-1~deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1543
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jul/3
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee22257b1418438ebaf54df98af4e24f494d1809
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=f426625b6ae9a7831010750490a5f0ad689c5ba3
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1543
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4475
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y3IVFGSERAZLNJCK35TEM2R4726XIH3Z/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZBEV5QGDRFUZDMNECFXUSN5FMYOZDE4V/
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190306.txt
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-1543
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ee22257b1418438ebaf54df98af4e24f494d1809
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f426625b6ae9a7831010750490a5f0ad689c5ba3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y3IVFGSERAZLNJCK35TEM2R4726XIH3Z/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZBEV5QGDRFUZDMNECFXUSN5FMYOZDE4V/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
- Fixed in: 232-25+deb9u11
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In systemd before v242-rc4, it was discovered that pam_systemd does not properly sanitize the environment before using the XDG_SEAT variable. It is possible for an attacker, in some particular configurations, to set a XDG_SEAT environment variable which allows for commands to be checked against polkit policies using the "allow_active" element rather than "allow_any".
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
systemd
to version 232-25+deb9u11 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-3842
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/04/msg00022.html
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46743/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/STR36RJE4ZZIORMDXRERVBHMPRNRTHAC/
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152610/systemd-Seat-Verification-Active-Session-Spoofing.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00062.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3842
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-3842
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/STR36RJE4ZZIORMDXRERVBHMPRNRTHAC/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: e2fsprogs
- Introduced through: e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2, e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2 and others
- Fixed in: 1.43.4-2+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libcomerr2@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libss2@1.43.4-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream e2fsprogs
package and not the e2fsprogs
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the quota file functionality of E2fsprogs 1.45.3. A specially crafted ext4 partition can cause an out-of-bounds write on the heap, resulting in code execution. An attacker can corrupt a partition to trigger this vulnerability.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
e2fsprogs
to version 1.43.4-2+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-5094
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-5094
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/58
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200115-0002/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4535
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00029.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AKETJ6BREDUHRWQTV35SPGG5C6H7KSI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6DOBCYQKCTTWXBLMUPJ5TX3FY7JNCOKY/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-05
- https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2019-0887
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4142-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-5094
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4142-2/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AKETJ6BREDUHRWQTV35SPGG5C6H7KSI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6DOBCYQKCTTWXBLMUPJ5TX3FY7JNCOKY/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: e2fsprogs
- Introduced through: e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2, e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2 and others
- Fixed in: 1.43.4-2+deb9u2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libcomerr2@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libss2@1.43.4-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream e2fsprogs
package and not the e2fsprogs
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A code execution vulnerability exists in the directory rehashing functionality of E2fsprogs e2fsck 1.45.4. A specially crafted ext4 directory can cause an out-of-bounds write on the stack, resulting in code execution. An attacker can corrupt a partition to trigger this vulnerability.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
e2fsprogs
to version 1.43.4-2+deb9u2 or higher.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-5188
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-5188
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AKETJ6BREDUHRWQTV35SPGG5C6H7KSI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6DOBCYQKCTTWXBLMUPJ5TX3FY7JNCOKY/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00030.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-02/msg00004.html
- https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2019-0973
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-5188
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4249-1/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220506-0001/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AKETJ6BREDUHRWQTV35SPGG5C6H7KSI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6DOBCYQKCTTWXBLMUPJ5TX3FY7JNCOKY/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: gnupg2/gpgv
- Introduced through: gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gnupg2
package and not the gnupg2
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
gnupg2
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-34903
- https://dev.gnupg.org/T6027
- https://bugs.debian.org/1014157
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/06/30/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/02/1
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5174
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NPTAR76EIZY7NQFENSOZO7U473257OVZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VN63GBTMRWO36Y7BKA2WQHROAKCXKCBL/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FRLWJQ76A4UKHI3Q36BKSJKS4LFLQO33/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU64FUVG2PRZBSHFOQRSP7KDVEIZ23OS/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220826-0005/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FRLWJQ76A4UKHI3Q36BKSJKS4LFLQO33/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NPTAR76EIZY7NQFENSOZO7U473257OVZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VN63GBTMRWO36Y7BKA2WQHROAKCXKCBL/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU64FUVG2PRZBSHFOQRSP7KDVEIZ23OS/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: libgcrypt20
- Introduced through: libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
- Fixed in: 1.7.6-2+deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libgcrypt20
package and not the libgcrypt20
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
libgcrypt20
to version 1.7.6-2+deb9u4 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-40528
- https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/923
- https://ibm.github.io/system-security-research-updates/2021/07/20/insecurity-elgamal-pt1
- https://ibm.github.io/system-security-research-updates/2021/09/06/insecurity-elgamal-pt2
- https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git;a=commit;h=3462280f2e23e16adf3ed5176e0f2413d8861320
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-13
- https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3462280f2e23e16adf3ed5176e0f2413d8861320
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
openssl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-4160
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6fc1aaaf303185aa5e483e06bdfae16daa9193a7
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220128.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=3bf7b73ea7123045b8f972badc67ed6878e6c37f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9e726506cd2a3fd9c0f12daf8cc1fe934c7dddb
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3bf7b73ea7123045b8f972badc67ed6878e6c37f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6fc1aaaf303185aa5e483e06bdfae16daa9193a7
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e9e726506cd2a3fd9c0f12daf8cc1fe934c7dddb
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u3 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-23841
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a51b9e1d0cf0bf8515f7201b68fb0a3482b3dc1
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b1129239f3ebb1d1c98ce9ed41d5c9476c47cb2
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210219-0009/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212528
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212529
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212534
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-03
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4855
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/67
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/68
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/70
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u2 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-1971
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201218-0005/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20201208.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-11
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
- https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4807
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DGSI34Y5LQ5RYXN4M2I5ZQT65LFVDOUU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PWPSSZNZOBJU2YR6Z4TGHXKYW3YP5QG7/
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl.asc
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-13
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b750c@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbb769f771711fb274e0a4acb1b5911c8aab544a6ac5e8c12d40c5143@%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00020.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00021.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b750c%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbb769f771711fb274e0a4acb1b5911c8aab544a6ac5e8c12d40c5143%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DGSI34Y5LQ5RYXN4M2I5ZQT65LFVDOUU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PWPSSZNZOBJU2YR6Z4TGHXKYW3YP5QG7/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
- Fixed in: 232-25+deb9u10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In systemd prior to 234 a race condition exists between .mount and .automount units such that automount requests from kernel may not be serviced by systemd resulting in kernel holding the mountpoint and any processes that try to use said mount will hang. A race condition like this may lead to denial of service, until mount points are unmounted.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
systemd
to version 232-25+deb9u10 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-1049
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00017.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534701
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0260
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041520
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-1049
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3558-1/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: apt
- Introduced through: apt@1.4.9 and apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
- Fixed in: 1.4.11
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt@1.4.9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream apt
package and not the apt
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
APT had several integer overflows and underflows while parsing .deb packages, aka GHSL-2020-168 GHSL-2020-169, in files apt-pkg/contrib/extracttar.cc, apt-pkg/deb/debfile.cc, and apt-pkg/contrib/arfile.cc. This issue affects: apt 1.2.32ubuntu0 versions prior to 1.2.32ubuntu0.2; 1.6.12ubuntu0 versions prior to 1.6.12ubuntu0.2; 2.0.2ubuntu0 versions prior to 2.0.2ubuntu0.2; 2.1.10ubuntu0 versions prior to 2.1.10ubuntu0.1;
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
apt
to version 1.4.11 or higher.
References
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: apt
- Introduced through: apt@1.4.9 and apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
- Fixed in: 1.4.10
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt@1.4.9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream apt
package and not the apt
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Missing input validation in the ar/tar implementations of APT before version 2.1.2 could result in denial of service when processing specially crafted deb files.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
apt
to version 1.4.10 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-3810
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U4PEH357MZM2SUGKETMEHMSGQS652QHH/
- https://github.com/Debian/apt/issues/111
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878177
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2020/msg00089.html
- https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/dceb1e49e4b8e4dadaf056be34088b415939cda6
- https://tracker.debian.org/news/1144109/accepted-apt-212-source-into-unstable/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4359-2/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-3810
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4359-1/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U4PEH357MZM2SUGKETMEHMSGQS652QHH/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
- Fixed in: 232-25+deb9u13
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
basic/unit-name.c in systemd prior to 246.15, 247.8, 248.5, and 249.1 has a Memory Allocation with an Excessive Size Value (involving strdupa and alloca for a pathname controlled by a local attacker) that results in an operating system crash.
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
systemd
to version 232-25+deb9u13 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-33910
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4942
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2LSDMHAKI4LGFOCSPXNVVSEWQFAVFWR7/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/42TMJVNYRY65B4QCJICBYOEIVZV3KUYI/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-48
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163621/Sequoia-A-Deep-Root-In-Linuxs-Filesystem-Layer.html
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/b34a4f0e6729de292cb3b0c03c1d48f246ad896b
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20256/commits/441e0115646d54f080e5c3bb0ba477c892861ab9
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/releases
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/4a1c5f34bd3e1daed4490e9d97918e504d19733b
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/764b74113e36ac5219a4b82a05f311b5a92136ce
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/b00674347337b7531c92fdb65590ab253bb57538
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/cfd14c65374027b34dbbc4f0551456c5dc2d1f61
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/20/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/04/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/17/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/07/3
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211104-0008/
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-222547.pdf
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2LSDMHAKI4LGFOCSPXNVVSEWQFAVFWR7/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/42TMJVNYRY65B4QCJICBYOEIVZV3KUYI/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u5 or higher.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1551
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1551
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/39
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/46
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=419102400a2811582a7a3d4a4e317d72e5ce0a8f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1c5eea8a817075d31e43f5876993c6710238c98
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2019-09
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-03
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-11
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4855
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4594
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DDHOAATPWJCXRNFMJ2SASDBBNU5RJONY/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXDDAOWSAIEFQNBHWYE6PPYFV4QXGMCD/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XVEP3LAK4JSPRXFO4QF4GG2IVXADV3SO/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202004-10
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155754/Slackware-Security-Advisory-openssl-Updates.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191210-0001/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20191206.txt
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00030.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4504-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-1551
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=419102400a2811582a7a3d4a4e317d72e5ce0a8f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f1c5eea8a817075d31e43f5876993c6710238c98
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DDHOAATPWJCXRNFMJ2SASDBBNU5RJONY/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EXDDAOWSAIEFQNBHWYE6PPYFV4QXGMCD/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XVEP3LAK4JSPRXFO4QF4GG2IVXADV3SO/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1547
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1547
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/0
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/1
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/25
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=21c856b75d81eff61aa63b4f036bb64a85bf6d46
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=30c22fa8b1d840036b8e203585738df62a03cec8
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=7c1709c2da5414f5b6133d00a03fc8c5bf996c7a
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200122-0002/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200416-0003/
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K73422160?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2019-08
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2019-09
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4539
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4540
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201911-04
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154467/Slackware-Security-Advisory-openssl-Updates.html
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01785
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00026.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0002/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00054.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00072.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00012.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00016.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4504-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-1547
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=21c856b75d81eff61aa63b4f036bb64a85bf6d46
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=30c22fa8b1d840036b8e203585738df62a03cec8
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7c1709c2da5414f5b6133d00a03fc8c5bf996c7a
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E/
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K73422160?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: tar@1.29b-1.1
- Fixed in: 1.29b-1.1+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › tar@1.29b-1.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream tar
package and not the tar
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Tar through 1.30, when --sparse is used, mishandles file shrinkage during read access, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (infinite read loop in sparse_dump_region in sparse.c) by modifying a file that is supposed to be archived by a different user's process (e.g., a system backup running as root).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
tar
to version 1.29b-1.1+deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-20482
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-20482
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/12/msg00023.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-05
- http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/tar.git/commit/?id=c15c42ccd1e2377945fd0414eca1a49294bff454
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2018-12/msg00023.html
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18745431
- https://twitter.com/thatcks/status/1076166645708668928
- https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/sysadmin/TarFindingTruncateBug
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00077.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106354
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-20482
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00025.html
low severity
- Vulnerable module: bzip2/libbz2-1.0
- Introduced through: bzip2/libbz2-1.0@1.0.6-8.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › bzip2/libbz2-1.0@1.0.6-8.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream bzip2
package and not the bzip2
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
BZ2_decompress in decompress.c in bzip2 through 1.0.6 has an out-of-bounds write when there are many selectors.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
bzip2
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-12900
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Aug/4
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jul/22
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K68713584?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12900
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/06/msg00021.html
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-19:18.bzip2.asc
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153644/Slackware-Security-Advisory-bzip2-Updates.html
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153957/FreeBSD-Security-Advisory-FreeBSD-SA-19-18.bzip2.html
- https://gitlab.com/federicomenaquintero/bzip2/commit/74de1e2e6ffc9d51ef9824db71a8ffee5962cdbc
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra0adb9653c7de9539b93cc8434143b655f753b9f60580ff260becb2b@%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rce8cd8c30f60604b580ea01bebda8a671a25c9a1629f409fc24e7774@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rda98305669476c4d90cc8527c4deda7e449019dd1fe9936b56671dd4@%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/07/msg00014.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/10/msg00012.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/10/msg00018.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00040.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00050.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00078.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00000.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4146-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4146-2/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-12900
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4038-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4038-2/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra0adb9653c7de9539b93cc8434143b655f753b9f60580ff260becb2b%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rce8cd8c30f60604b580ea01bebda8a671a25c9a1629f409fc24e7774%40%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rda98305669476c4d90cc8527c4deda7e449019dd1fe9936b56671dd4%40%3Cuser.flink.apache.org%3E
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K68713584?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: db5.3/libdb5.3
- Introduced through: db5.3/libdb5.3@5.3.28-12+deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › db5.3/libdb5.3@5.3.28-12+deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream db5.3
package and not the db5.3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
SQLite3 from 3.6.0 to and including 3.27.2 is vulnerable to heap out-of-bound read in the rtreenode() function when handling invalid rtree tables.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
db5.3
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-8457
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-8457
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OPKYSWCOM3CL66RI76TYVIG6TJ263RXH/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SJPFGA45DI4F5MCF2OAACGH3HQOF4G3M/
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_28_0.html
- https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/90acdbfce9c08858
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190606-0002/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00074.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-8457
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4004-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4004-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4019-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4019-2/
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OPKYSWCOM3CL66RI76TYVIG6TJ263RXH/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SJPFGA45DI4F5MCF2OAACGH3HQOF4G3M/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The deprecated compatibility function clnt_create in the sunrpc module of the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34 copies its hostname argument on the stack without validating its length, which may result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in a denial of service or (if an application is not built with a stack protector enabled) arbitrary code execution.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The deprecated compatibility function svcunix_create in the sunrpc module of the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34 copies its path argument on the stack without validating its length, which may result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in a denial of service or (if an application is not built with a stack protector enabled) arbitrary code execution.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Libc current is affected by: Mitigation bypass. The impact is: Attacker may bypass stack guard protection. The component is: nptl. The attack vector is: Exploit stack buffer overflow vulnerability and use this bypass vulnerability to bypass stack guard. NOTE: Upstream comments indicate "this is being treated as a non-security bug and no real threat.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-9169
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10278
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K54823184
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34140
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34142
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24114
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=583dd860d5b833037175247230a328f0050dbfe9
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190315-0002/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107160
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-9169
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=583dd860d5b833037175247230a328f0050dbfe9
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6485
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22343
- http://bugs.debian.org/878159
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003/
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3092
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102912
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-6485
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4218-1/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The malloc implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6), from version 2.24 to 2.26 on powerpc, and only in version 2.26 on i386, did not properly handle malloc calls with arguments close to SIZE_MAX and could return a pointer to a heap region that is smaller than requested, eventually leading to heap corruption.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6551
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22774
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003/
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=8e448310d74b283c5cd02b9ed7fb997b47bf9b22
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The mq_notify function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) versions 2.32 and 2.33 has a use-after-free. It may use the notification thread attributes object (passed through its struct sigevent parameter) after it has been freed by the caller, leading to a denial of service (application crash) or possibly unspecified other impact.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-33574
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210629-0005/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RBUUWUGXVILQXVWEOU7N42ICHPJNAEUP/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27896
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27896#c1
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KJYYIMDDYOHTP2PORLABTOHYQYYREZDD/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KJYYIMDDYOHTP2PORLABTOHYQYYREZDD/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RBUUWUGXVILQXVWEOU7N42ICHPJNAEUP/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
systemd v233 and earlier fails to safely parse usernames starting with a numeric digit (e.g. "0day"), running the service in question with root privileges rather than the user intended.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: tar@1.29b-1.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › tar@1.29b-1.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream tar
package and not the tar
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Tar 1.15.1 does not properly warn the user when extracting setuid or setgid files, which may allow local users or remote attackers to gain privileges.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
tar
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2005-2541
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112327628230258&w=2
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc713534b10f9daeee2e0990239fa407e2118e4aa9e88a7041177497c@%3Cissues.guacamole.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc713534b10f9daeee2e0990239fa407e2118e4aa9e88a7041177497c%40%3Cissues.guacamole.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The wordexp function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.33 may crash or read arbitrary memory in parse_param (in posix/wordexp.c) when called with an untrusted, crafted pattern, potentially resulting in a denial of service or disclosure of information. This occurs because atoi was used but strtoul should have been used to ensure correct calculations.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-35942
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210827-0005/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28011
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=5adda61f62b77384718b4c0d8336ade8f2b4b35c
- https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Security%20Exceptions
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-24
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5adda61f62b77384718b4c0d8336ade8f2b4b35c
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Libc current is affected by: Re-mapping current loaded library with malicious ELF file. The impact is: In worst case attacker may evaluate privileges. The component is: libld. The attack vector is: Attacker sends 2 ELF files to victim and asks to run ldd on it. ldd execute code. NOTE: Upstream comments indicate "this is being treated as a non-security bug and no real threat.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1010023
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K11932200?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22851
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109167
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-1010023
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K11932200?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: gnupg2/gpgv
- Introduced through: gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gnupg2
package and not the gnupg2
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GnuPG version 2.1.12 - 2.2.11 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dirmngr that can result in Attacker controlled CSRF, Information Disclosure, DoS. This attack appear to be exploitable via Victim must perform a WKD request, e.g. enter an email address in the composer window of Thunderbird/Enigmail. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in after commit 4a4bb874f63741026bd26264c43bb32b1099f060.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
gnupg2
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: ncurses/libncurses5
- Introduced through: ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2, ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libtinfo5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-base@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-bin@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ncurses
package and not the ncurses
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An issue was discovered in ncurses through v6.2-1. _nc_captoinfo in captoinfo.c has a heap-based buffer overflow.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
ncurses
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-39537
- http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/devel/ncurses/patches/patch-ncurses_tinfo_captoinfo.c?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2020-08/msg00006.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2021-10/msg00023.html
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213488
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213443
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213444
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/41
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/28
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/43
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/45
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0012/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/12/msg00004.html
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An exploitable signed comparison vulnerability exists in the ARMv7 memcpy() implementation of GNU glibc 2.30.9000. Calling memcpy() (on ARMv7 targets that utilize the GNU glibc implementation) with a negative value for the 'num' parameter results in a signed comparison vulnerability. If an attacker underflows the 'num' parameter to memcpy(), this vulnerability could lead to undefined behavior such as writing to out-of-bounds memory and potentially remote code execution. Furthermore, this memcpy() implementation allows for program execution to continue in scenarios where a segmentation fault or crash should have occurred. The dangers occur in that subsequent execution and iterations of this code will be executed with this corrupted data.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-6096
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SPYXTDOOB4PQGTYAMZAZNJIB3FF6YQXI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/URXOIA2LDUKHQXK4BE55BQBRI6ZZG3Y6/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-20
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25620
- https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2020-1019
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SPYXTDOOB4PQGTYAMZAZNJIB3FF6YQXI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/URXOIA2LDUKHQXK4BE55BQBRI6ZZG3Y6/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: lz4/liblz4-1
- Introduced through: lz4/liblz4-1@0.0~r131-2+b1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › lz4/liblz4-1@0.0~r131-2+b1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream lz4
package and not the lz4
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
LZ4 before 1.9.2 has a heap-based buffer overflow in LZ4_write32 (related to LZ4_compress_destSize), affecting applications that call LZ4_compress_fast with a large input. (This issue can also lead to data corruption.) NOTE: the vendor states "only a few specific / uncommon usages of the API are at risk."
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
lz4
.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-17543
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-17543
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/25015588b770d67470b7ba7ea49a305d6735dd7f00eabe7d50ec1e17@%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/793012683dc0fa6819b7c2560e6cf990811014c40c7d75412099c357@%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9ff0606d16be2ab6a81619e1c9e23c3e251756638e36272c8c8b7fa3@%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f0038c4fab2ee25aee849ebeff6b33b3aa89e07ccfb06b5c87b36316@%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f506bc371d4a068d5d84d7361293568f61167d3a1c3e91f0def2d7d3@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://github.com/lz4/lz4/compare/v1.9.1...v1.9.2
- https://github.com/lz4/lz4/issues/801
- https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/756
- https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/760
- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15941
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0fb226357e7988a241b06b93bab065bcea2eb38658b382e485960e26@%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/543302d55e2d2da4311994e9b0debdc676bf3fd05e1a2be3407aa2d6@%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4068ba81066792f2b4d208b39c4c4713c5d4c79bd8cb6c1904af5720@%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc72200f94298bc9a0e35637f388deb53467ca4b2e2ad1ff66d8960@%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00069.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00070.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-17543
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210723-0001/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/25015588b770d67470b7ba7ea49a305d6735dd7f00eabe7d50ec1e17%40%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/543302d55e2d2da4311994e9b0debdc676bf3fd05e1a2be3407aa2d6%40%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/793012683dc0fa6819b7c2560e6cf990811014c40c7d75412099c357%40%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9ff0606d16be2ab6a81619e1c9e23c3e251756638e36272c8c8b7fa3%40%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f0038c4fab2ee25aee849ebeff6b33b3aa89e07ccfb06b5c87b36316%40%3Cissues.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f506bc371d4a068d5d84d7361293568f61167d3a1c3e91f0def2d7d3%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0fb226357e7988a241b06b93bab065bcea2eb38658b382e485960e26%40%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4068ba81066792f2b4d208b39c4c4713c5d4c79bd8cb6c1904af5720%40%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc72200f94298bc9a0e35637f388deb53467ca4b2e2ad1ff66d8960%40%3Cissues.kudu.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: bash
- Introduced through: bash@4.4-5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › bash@4.4-5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream bash
package and not the bash
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An issue was discovered in disable_priv_mode in shell.c in GNU Bash through 5.0 patch 11. By default, if Bash is run with its effective UID not equal to its real UID, it will drop privileges by setting its effective UID to its real UID. However, it does so incorrectly. On Linux and other systems that support "saved UID" functionality, the saved UID is not dropped. An attacker with command execution in the shell can use "enable -f" for runtime loading of a new builtin, which can be a shared object that calls setuid() and therefore regains privileges. However, binaries running with an effective UID of 0 are unaffected.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
bash
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-18276
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200430-0003/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-34
- https://github.com/bminor/bash/commit/951bdaad7a18cc0dc1036bba86b18b90874d39ff
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155498/Bash-5.0-Patch-11-Privilege-Escalation.html
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wGtxJ8opa8
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-18276
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47726
low severity
- Vulnerable module: e2fsprogs
- Introduced through: e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2, e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/e2fslibs@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libcomerr2@1.43.4-2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › e2fsprogs/libss2@1.43.4-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream e2fsprogs
package and not the e2fsprogs
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability was found in e2fsprogs 1.46.5. This issue leads to a segmentation fault and possibly arbitrary code execution via a specially crafted filesystem.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
e2fsprogs
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The string component in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.28, when running on the x32 architecture, incorrectly attempts to use a 64-bit register for size_t in assembly codes, which can lead to a segmentation fault or possibly unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by a crash in __memmove_avx_unaligned_erms in sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S during a memcpy.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3999
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/24/4
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3999
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=23e0e8f5f1fb5ed150253d986ecccdc90c2dcd5e
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28769
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024637
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221104-0001/
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0896
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Bh=23e0e8f5f1fb5ed150253d986ecccdc90c2dcd5e
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In glibc 2.26 and earlier there is confusion in the usage of getcwd() by realpath() which can be used to write before the destination buffer leading to a buffer underflow and potential code execution.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-1000001
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43775/
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44889/
- https://www.halfdog.net/Security/2017/LibcRealpathBufferUnderflow/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003/
- http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q1/38
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0805
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102525
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040162
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-1000001
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3534-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3536-1/
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44889
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the pcre32_copy_substring function in pcre_get.c in libpcre1 in PCRE 8.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (WRITE of size 4) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-7245
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-7245
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-25
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/03/20/libpcre-two-stack-based-buffer-overflow-write-in-pcre32_copy_substring-pcre_get-c/
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2486
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97067
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2017-7245
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Stack-based buffer overflow in the pcre32_copy_substring function in pcre_get.c in libpcre1 in PCRE 8.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (WRITE of size 268) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-7246
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-7246
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-25
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/03/20/libpcre-two-stack-based-buffer-overflow-write-in-pcre32_copy_substring-pcre_get-c/
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2486
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97067
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2017-7246
low severity
- Vulnerable module: perl/perl-base
- Introduced through: perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream perl
package and not the perl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
CPAN 2.28 allows Signature Verification Bypass.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
perl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-16156
- https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/CPAN/scripts/cpan
- https://blog.hackeriet.no/cpan-signature-verification-vulnerabilities/
- http://blogs.perl.org/users/neilb/2021/11/addressing-cpan-vulnerabilities-related-to-checksums.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SZ32AJIV4RHJMLWLU5QULGKMMIHYOMDC/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SD6RYOJII7HRJ6WVORFNVTYNOFY5JDXN/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SD6RYOJII7HRJ6WVORFNVTYNOFY5JDXN/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SZ32AJIV4RHJMLWLU5QULGKMMIHYOMDC/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
shadow 4.8, in certain circumstances affecting at least Gentoo, Arch Linux, and Void Linux, allows local users to obtain root access because setuid programs are misconfigured. Specifically, this affects shadow 4.8 when compiled using --with-libpam but without explicitly passing --disable-account-tools-setuid, and without a PAM configuration suitable for use with setuid account management tools. This combination leads to account management tools (groupadd, groupdel, groupmod, useradd, userdel, usermod) that can easily be used by unprivileged local users to escalate privileges to root in multiple ways. This issue became much more relevant in approximately December 2019 when an unrelated bug was fixed (i.e., the chmod calls to suidusbins were fixed in the upstream Makefile which is now included in the release version 4.8).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
shadow
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-19882
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202008-09
- https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/edf7547ad5aa650be868cf2dac58944773c12d75
- https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/199
- https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/17580
- https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64836
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/702252
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
systemd-tmpfiles in systemd through 237 mishandles symlinks present in non-terminal path components, which allows local users to obtain ownership of arbitrary files via vectors involving creation of a directory and a file under that directory, and later replacing that directory with a symlink. This occurs even if the fs.protected_symlinks sysctl is turned on.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6954
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7986
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00062.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-6954
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3816-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3816-2/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
It was discovered that a systemd service that uses DynamicUser property can create a SUID/SGID binary that would be allowed to run as the transient service UID/GID even after the service is terminated. A local attacker may use this flaw to access resources that will be owned by a potentially different service in the future, when the UID/GID will be recycled.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-3843
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5JXQAKSTMABZ46EVCRMW62DHWYHTTFES/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190619-0002/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3843
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108116
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4269-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-3843
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5JXQAKSTMABZ46EVCRMW62DHWYHTTFES/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
systemd-tmpfiles in systemd before 237 attempts to support ownership/permission changes on hardlinked files even if the fs.protected_hardlinks sysctl is turned off, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via vectors involving a hard link to a file for which the user lacks write access, as demonstrated by changing the ownership of the /etc/passwd file.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-18078
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/04/msg00022.html
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43935/
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7736
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/146184/systemd-Local-Privilege-Escalation.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2018-02/msg00109.html
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/01/29/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/01/29/3
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
It was discovered that a systemd service that uses DynamicUser property can get new privileges through the execution of SUID binaries, which would allow to create binaries owned by the service transient group with the setgid bit set. A local attacker may use this flaw to access resources that will be owned by a potentially different service in the future, when the GID will be recycled.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-3844
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190619-0002/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3844
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108096
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4269-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-3844
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: util-linux
- Introduced through: util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1, util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libblkid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libfdisk1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libmount1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libsmartcols1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libuuid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/mount@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream util-linux
package and not the util-linux
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
runuser in util-linux allows local users to escape to the parent session via a crafted TIOCSTI ioctl call, which pushes characters to the terminal's input buffer.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
util-linux
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.28, parse_reg_exp in posix/regcomp.c misparses alternatives, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) or trigger an incorrect result by attempting a regular-expression match.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-5155
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64119434
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64119434?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=5513b40999149090987a0341c018d05d3eea1272
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22793
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32806
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34238
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11053
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18986
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=eb04c21373e2a2885f3d52ff192b0499afe3c672
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190315-0002/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2009-5155
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Bh=eb04c21373e2a2885f3d52ff192b0499afe3c672
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64119434?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid input sequences in the ISO-2022-JP-3 encoding, fails an assertion in the code path and aborts the program, potentially resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3326
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210304-0007/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27256
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=7d88c6142c6efc160c0ee5e4f85cde382c072888
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/28/2
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7d88c6142c6efc160c0ee5e4f85cde382c072888
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, check_dst_limits_calc_pos_1 in posix/regexec.c has Uncontrolled Recursion, as demonstrated by '(|)(\1\1)*' in grep, a different issue than CVE-2018-20796. NOTE: the software maintainer disputes that this is a vulnerability because the behavior occurs only with a crafted pattern
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-9192
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26346590?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24269
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-9192
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26346590?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, check_dst_limits_calc_pos_1 in posix/regexec.c has Uncontrolled Recursion, as demonstrated by '(\227|)(\1\1|t1|\\2537)+' in grep.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-20796
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26346590?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34141
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-01/msg00108.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190315-0002/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107160
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-20796
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26346590?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: gnupg2/gpgv
- Introduced through: gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gnupg2
package and not the gnupg2
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GnuPG 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 does not enforce a configuration in which key certification requires an offline master Certify key, which results in apparently valid certifications that occurred only with access to a signing subkey.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
gnupg2
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: gnupg2/gpgv
- Introduced through: gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › gnupg2/gpgv@2.1.18-8~deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream gnupg2
package and not the gnupg2
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A flaw was found in the way certificate signatures could be forged using collisions found in the SHA-1 algorithm. An attacker could use this weakness to create forged certificate signatures. This issue affects GnuPG versions before 2.2.18.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
gnupg2
.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-14855
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-14855
- https://dev.gnupg.org/T4755
- https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2019q4/000442.html
- https://rwc.iacr.org/2020/slides/Leurent.pdf
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14855
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4516-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-14855
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libgcrypt20
- Introduced through: libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libgcrypt20
package and not the libgcrypt20
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libgcrypt20
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-33560
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BKKTOIGFW2SGN3DO2UHHVZ7MJSYN4AAB/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R7OAPCUGPF3VLA7QAJUQSL255D4ITVTL/
- https://dev.gnupg.org/rCe8b7f10be275bcedb5fc05ed4837a89bfd605c61
- https://dev.gnupg.org/T5305
- https://dev.gnupg.org/T5328
- https://dev.gnupg.org/T5466
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-13
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BKKTOIGFW2SGN3DO2UHHVZ7MJSYN4AAB/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R7OAPCUGPF3VLA7QAJUQSL255D4ITVTL/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libgcrypt20
- Introduced through: libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libgcrypt20
package and not the libgcrypt20
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libgcrypt20
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6829
- https://github.com/weikengchen/attack-on-libgcrypt-elgamal
- https://github.com/weikengchen/attack-on-libgcrypt-elgamal/wiki
- https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2018-February/004394.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
libpcre in PCRE before 8.43 allows a subject buffer over-read in JIT when UTF is disabled, and \X or \R has more than one fixed quantifier, a related issue to CVE-2019-20454.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-20838
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-20838
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT211931
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212147
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Dec/32
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Feb/14
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/717920
- https://www.pcre.org/original/changelog.txt
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In PCRE 8.41, the OP_KETRMAX feature in the match function in pcre_exec.c allows stack exhaustion (uncontrolled recursion) when processing a crafted regular expression.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-11164
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-11164
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/11/3
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99575
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2017-11164
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/11/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/12/1
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: perl/perl-base
- Introduced through: perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › perl/perl-base@5.24.1-3+deb9u5
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream perl
package and not the perl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
_is_safe in the File::Temp module for Perl does not properly handle symlinks.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
perl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-4116
- https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/File-Temp/issues/14
- https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69106
- https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q4/238
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/04/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/04/4
low severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: tar@1.29b-1.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › tar@1.29b-1.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream tar
package and not the tar
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
pax_decode_header in sparse.c in GNU Tar before 1.32 had a NULL pointer dereference when parsing certain archives that have malformed extended headers.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
tar
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-9923
- http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/tar.git/commit/?id=cb07844454d8cc9fb21f53ace75975f91185a120
- http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55369
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tar/+bug/1810241
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00077.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-9923
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: ncurses/libncurses5
- Introduced through: ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2, ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libtinfo5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-base@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-bin@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ncurses
package and not the ncurses
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
ncurses 6.3 before patch 20220416 has an out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in convert_strings in tinfo/read_entry.c in the terminfo library.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
ncurses
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-29458
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2022-04/msg00016.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2022-04/msg00014.html
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213488
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00037.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/41
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Oct/28
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in glibc before 2.31 when handling signal trampolines on PowerPC. Specifically, the backtrace function did not properly check the array bounds when storing the frame address, resulting in a denial of service or potential code execution. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-1751
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-1751
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25423
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200430-0002/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1751
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A use-after-free vulnerability introduced in glibc upstream version 2.14 was found in the way the tilde expansion was carried out. Directory paths containing an initial tilde followed by a valid username were affected by this issue. A local attacker could exploit this flaw by creating a specially crafted path that, when processed by the glob function, would potentially lead to arbitrary code execution. This was fixed in version 2.32.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-1752
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25414
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=ddc650e9b3dc916eab417ce9f79e67337b05035c
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-20
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200511-0005/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1752
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-1752
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Bh=ddc650e9b3dc916eab417ce9f79e67337b05035c
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
systemd through v245 mishandles numerical usernames such as ones composed of decimal digits or 0x followed by hex digits, as demonstrated by use of root privileges when privileges of the 0x0 user account were intended. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-1000082.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-13776
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-13776
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200611-0003/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IYGLFEKG45EYBJ7TPQMLWROWPTZBEU63/
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15985
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IYGLFEKG45EYBJ7TPQMLWROWPTZBEU63/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: coreutils
- Introduced through: coreutils@8.26-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › coreutils@8.26-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream coreutils
package and not the coreutils
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
chroot in GNU coreutils, when used with --userspec, allows local users to escape to the parent session via a crafted TIOCSTI ioctl call, which pushes characters to the terminal's input buffer.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
coreutils
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-2781
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/28/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/28/3
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2016-2781
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libgcrypt20
- Introduced through: libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libgcrypt20@1.7.6-2+deb9u3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libgcrypt20
package and not the libgcrypt20
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
It was discovered that there was a ECDSA timing attack in the libgcrypt20 cryptographic library. Version affected: 1.8.4-5, 1.7.6-2+deb9u3, and 1.6.3-2+deb8u4. Versions fixed: 1.8.5-2 and 1.6.3-2+deb8u7.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libgcrypt20
.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-13627
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-13627
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00024.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/01/msg00001.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-32
- https://github.com/gpg/libgcrypt/releases/tag/libgcrypt-1.8.5
- https://minerva.crocs.fi.muni.cz/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00060.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00018.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/02/2
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-13627
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4236-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4236-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4236-3/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
initscripts in rPath Linux 1 sets insecure permissions for the /var/log/btmp file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information regarding authentication attempts. NOTE: because sshd detects the insecure permissions and does not log certain events, this also prevents sshd from logging failed authentication attempts by remote attackers.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
shadow
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-5686
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482129/100/100/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482857/100/0/threaded
- https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-1825
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27215
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26048
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3474
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Systemd 245. A specially crafted DHCP FORCERENEW packet can cause a server running the DHCP client to be vulnerable to a DHCP ACK spoofing attack. An attacker can forge a pair of FORCERENEW and DCHP ACK packets to reconfigure the server.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-13529
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210625-0005/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/42TMJVNYRY65B4QCJICBYOEIVZV3KUYI/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-48
- https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2020-1142
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/04/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/17/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/07/3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/42TMJVNYRY65B4QCJICBYOEIVZV3KUYI/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The DNS stub resolver in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before version 2.26, when EDNS support is enabled, will solicit large UDP responses from name servers, potentially simplifying off-path DNS spoofing attacks due to IP fragmentation.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The pop_fail_stack function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application crash) via vectors related to extended regular expression processing.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8985
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779392
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201908-06
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/14/9
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76916
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2015-8985
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The iconv program in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.31 and earlier, when invoked with multiple suffixes in the destination encoding (TRANSLATE or IGNORE) along with the -c option, enters an infinite loop when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences, leading to a denial of service.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10228
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19519#c21
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26224
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-20
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19519
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/03/01/10
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96525
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2016-10228
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The iconv feature in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.32, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in the EUC-KR encoding, may have a buffer over-read.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-25013
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210205-0004/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4Y6TX47P47KABSFOL26FLDNVCWXDKDEZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TVCUNLQ3HXGS4VPUQKWTJGRAW2KTFGXS/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24973
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=ee7a3144c9922808181009b7b3e50e852fb4999b
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r32d767ac804e9b8aad4355bb85960a6a1385eab7afff549a5e98660f@%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r448bb851cc8e6e3f93f3c28c70032b37062625d81214744474ac49e7@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4806a391091e082bdea17266452ca656ebc176e51bb3932733b3a0a2@%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r499e4f96d0b5109ef083f2feccd33c51650c1b7d7068aa3bd47efca9@%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5af4430421bb6f9973294691a7904bbd260937e9eef96b20556f43ff@%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r750eee18542bc02bd8350861c424ee60a9b9b225568fa09436a37ece@%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7a2e94adfe0a2f0a1d42e4927e8c32ecac97d37db9cb68095fe9ddbc@%3Cdev.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2354f9ccce41e494fbadcbc5ad87218de6ec0fff8a7b54c8462226c@%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r32d767ac804e9b8aad4355bb85960a6a1385eab7afff549a5e98660f%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r448bb851cc8e6e3f93f3c28c70032b37062625d81214744474ac49e7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4806a391091e082bdea17266452ca656ebc176e51bb3932733b3a0a2%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r499e4f96d0b5109ef083f2feccd33c51650c1b7d7068aa3bd47efca9%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5af4430421bb6f9973294691a7904bbd260937e9eef96b20556f43ff%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r750eee18542bc02bd8350861c424ee60a9b9b225568fa09436a37ece%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7a2e94adfe0a2f0a1d42e4927e8c32ecac97d37db9cb68095fe9ddbc%40%3Cdev.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2354f9ccce41e494fbadcbc5ad87218de6ec0fff8a7b54c8462226c%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4Y6TX47P47KABSFOL26FLDNVCWXDKDEZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TVCUNLQ3HXGS4VPUQKWTJGRAW2KTFGXS/
- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ee7a3144c9922808181009b7b3e50e852fb4999b
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, the memcmp function for the x32 architecture can incorrectly return zero (indicating that the inputs are equal) because the RDX most significant bit is mishandled.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-7309
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-7309
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in IBM1364, IBM1371, IBM1388, IBM1390, and IBM1399 encodings, fails to advance the input state, which could lead to an infinite loop in applications, resulting in a denial of service, a different vulnerability from CVE-2016-10228.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-27618
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210401-0006/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19519#c21
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26224
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.32 could overflow an on-stack buffer during range reduction if an input to an 80-bit long double function contains a non-canonical bit pattern, a seen when passing a 0x5d414141414141410000 value to sinl on x86 targets. This is related to sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96/e_rem_pio2l.c.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-10029
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-10029
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JZTFUD5VH2GU3YOXA2KBQSBIDZRDWNZ3/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU5JJGENOK7K4X5RYAA5PL647C6HD22E/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/23N76M3EDP2GIW4GOIQRYTKRE7PPBRB2/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25487
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=9333498794cde1d5cca518badf79533a24114b6f
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200327-0003/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00033.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/23N76M3EDP2GIW4GOIQRYTKRE7PPBRB2/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JZTFUD5VH2GU3YOXA2KBQSBIDZRDWNZ3/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU5JJGENOK7K4X5RYAA5PL647C6HD22E/
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=9333498794cde1d5cca518badf79533a24114b6f
low severity
- Vulnerable module: ncurses/libncurses5
- Introduced through: ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2, ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libtinfo5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-base@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-bin@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ncurses
package and not the ncurses
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In ncurses 6.1, there is a NULL pointer dereference at function _nc_parse_entry in parse_entry.c that will lead to a denial of service attack. The product proceeds to the dereference code path even after a "dubious character `*' in name or alias field" detection.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
ncurses
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In PCRE 8.41, after compiling, a pcretest load test PoC produces a crash overflow in the function match() in pcre_exec.c because of a self-recursive call. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this report, noting that there are options that can be used to limit the amount of stack that is used
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-16231
- https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2047
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-16231
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/150897/PCRE-8.41-Buffer-Overflow.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/11/01/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/11/01/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/11/01/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/11/01/8
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Dec/33
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101688
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A flaw was found in systemd. An uncontrolled recursion in systemd-tmpfiles may lead to a denial of service at boot time when too many nested directories are created in /tmp.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3997
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024639
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/10/2
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-15
low severity
- Vulnerable module: tar
- Introduced through: tar@1.29b-1.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › tar@1.29b-1.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream tar
package and not the tar
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier. This flaw allows an attacker who can submit a crafted input file to tar to cause uncontrolled consumption of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
tar
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: util-linux
- Introduced through: util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1, util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libblkid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libfdisk1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libmount1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libsmartcols1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libuuid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/mount@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream util-linux
package and not the util-linux
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
A flaw was found in the util-linux chfn and chsh utilities when compiled with Readline support. The Readline library uses an "INPUTRC" environment variable to get a path to the library config file. When the library cannot parse the specified file, it prints an error message containing data from the file. This flaw allows an unprivileged user to read root-owned files, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This flaw affects util-linux versions prior to 2.37.4.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
util-linux
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-0563
- https://lore.kernel.org/util-linux/20220214110609.msiwlm457ngoic6w@ws.net.home/T/#u
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220331-0002/
- https://lore.kernel.org/util-linux/20220214110609.msiwlm457ngoic6w%40ws.net.home/T/#u
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-08
low severity
- Vulnerable module: util-linux
- Introduced through: util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1, util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/bsdutils@1:2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libblkid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libfdisk1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libmount1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libsmartcols1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/libuuid1@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › util-linux/mount@2.29.2-1+deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream util-linux
package and not the util-linux
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An integer overflow in util-linux through 2.37.1 can potentially cause a buffer overflow if an attacker were able to use system resources in a way that leads to a large number in the /proc/sysvipc/sem file. NOTE: this is unexploitable in GNU C Library environments, and possibly in all realistic environments.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
util-linux
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-37600
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210902-0002/
- https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/1c9143d0c1f979c3daf10e1c37b5b1e916c22a1c
- https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/issues/1395
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-08
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/04/msg00005.html
low severity
- Vulnerable module: ncurses/libncurses5
- Introduced through: ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2, ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libtinfo5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-base@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-bin@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ncurses
package and not the ncurses
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the fmt_entry function in tinfo/comp_hash.c in the terminfo library in ncurses before 6.1-20191012.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
ncurses
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-17595
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-28
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2019-10/msg00013.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2019-10/msg00045.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00059.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00061.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-17595
low severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The NIST SP 800-90A default statement of the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generation (Dual_EC_DRBG) algorithm contains point Q constants with a possible relationship to certain "skeleton key" values, which might allow context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of those values. NOTE: this is a preliminary CVE for Dual_EC_DRBG; future research may provide additional details about point Q and associated attacks, and could potentially lead to a RECAST or REJECT of this CVE.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
openssl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-6755
- http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/
- http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html
- http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/the-many-flaws-of-dualecdrbg.html
- http://rump2007.cr.yp.to/15-shumow.pdf
- http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/
- https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html
- http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63657
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.28, the getaddrinfo function would successfully parse a string that contained an IPv4 address followed by whitespace and arbitrary characters, which could lead applications to incorrectly assume that it had parsed a valid string, without the possibility of embedded HTTP headers or other potentially dangerous substrings.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10739
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20018
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00082.html
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3513
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347549
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2118
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106672
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2016-10739
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Libc current is affected by: Mitigation bypass. The impact is: Attacker may bypass ASLR using cache of thread stack and heap. The component is: glibc. NOTE: Upstream comments indicate "this is being treated as a non-security bug and no real threat.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1010024
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22852
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109162
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-1010024
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
GNU Libc current is affected by: Mitigation bypass. The impact is: Attacker may guess the heap addresses of pthread_created thread. The component is: glibc. NOTE: the vendor's position is "ASLR bypass itself is not a vulnerability.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1010025
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22853
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-1010025
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K06046097?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: ncurses/libncurses5
- Introduced through: ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2, ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncurses5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libncursesw5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/libtinfo5@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-base@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › ncurses/ncurses-bin@6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream ncurses
package and not the ncurses
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the _nc_find_entry function in tinfo/comp_hash.c in the terminfo library in ncurses before 6.1-20191012.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
ncurses
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-17594
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-28
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2019-10/msg00017.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2019-10/msg00045.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00059.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00061.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-17594
low severity
- Vulnerable module: pcre3/libpcre3
- Introduced through: pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › pcre3/libpcre3@2:8.39-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream pcre3
package and not the pcre3
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
libpcre in PCRE before 8.44 allows an integer overflow via a large number after a (?C substring.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
pcre3
.
References
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2020-14155
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-14155
- https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2020/07/01/security-release-13-1-2-release/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT211931
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212147
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Dec/32
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Feb/14
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/717920
- https://www.pcre.org/original/changelog.txt
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221028-0010/
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An issue was discovered in shadow 4.5. newgidmap (in shadow-utils) is setuid and allows an unprivileged user to be placed in a user namespace where setgroups(2) is permitted. This allows an attacker to remove themselves from a supplementary group, which may allow access to certain filesystem paths if the administrator has used "group blacklisting" (e.g., chmod g-rwx) to restrict access to paths. This flaw effectively reverts a security feature in the kernel (in particular, the /proc/self/setgroups knob) to prevent this sort of privilege escalation.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
shadow
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
OpenSSL 0.9.8i on the Gaisler Research LEON3 SoC on the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro FPGA uses a Fixed Width Exponentiation (FWE) algorithm for certain signature calculations, and does not verify the signature before providing it to a caller, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to determine the private key via a modified supply voltage for the microprocessor, related to a "fault-based attack."
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
openssl
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-0928
- http://rdist.root.org/2010/03/08/attacking-rsa-exponentiation-with-fault-injection/
- http://www.eecs.umich.edu/%7Evaleria/research/publications/DATE10RSA.pdf
- http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/030410-rsa-security-attack.html
- http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/04/severe_openssl_vulnerability/
- http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/56750
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/56750
- http://www.osvdb.org/62808
- http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DATE10RSA.pdf
low severity
- Vulnerable module: coreutils
- Introduced through: coreutils@8.26-3
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › coreutils@8.26-3
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream coreutils
package and not the coreutils
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In GNU Coreutils through 8.29, chown-core.c in chown and chgrp does not prevent replacement of a plain file with a symlink during use of the POSIX "-R -L" options, which allows local users to modify the ownership of arbitrary files by leveraging a race condition.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
coreutils
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: shadow/login
- Introduced through: shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1 and shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/login@1:4.4-4.1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › shadow/passwd@1:4.4-4.1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream shadow
package and not the shadow
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
shadow: TOCTOU (time-of-check time-of-use) race condition when copying and removing directory trees
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
shadow
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-4235
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-4235
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2013-4235
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2013-4235
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-26
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
It was discovered systemd does not correctly check the content of PIDFile files before using it to kill processes. When a service is run from an unprivileged user (e.g. User field set in the service file), a local attacker who is able to write to the PIDFile of the mentioned service may use this flaw to trick systemd into killing other services and/or privileged processes. Versions before v237 are vulnerable.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-16888
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5960a34a524848cd722fd7ab7e2227eac10107b0f90d9d1e9c3caa74@%3Cuser.cassandra.apache.org%3E
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190307-0007/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16888
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2091
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4269-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2018-16888
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5960a34a524848cd722fd7ab7e2227eac10107b0f90d9d1e9c3caa74%40%3Cuser.cassandra.apache.org%3E
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
systemd, when updating file permissions, allows local users to change the permissions and SELinux security contexts for arbitrary files via a symlink attack on unspecified files.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The glob implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via crafted glob expressions that do not match any pathnames, as demonstrated by glob expressions in STAT commands to an FTP daemon, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2632.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
low severity
- Vulnerable module: apt
- Introduced through: apt@1.4.9 and apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt@1.4.9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › apt/libapt-pkg5.0@1.4.9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream apt
package and not the apt
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
It was found that apt-key in apt, all versions, do not correctly validate gpg keys with the master keyring, leading to a potential man-in-the-middle attack.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
apt
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3374
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642480
- https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2011/CVE-2011-3374.html
- https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Sep/221
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-LINUX-APT-116518
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2011-3374
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3374
low severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl
- Introduced through: openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1, openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 and others
- Fixed in: 1.1.0l-1~deb9u1
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl-dev@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).
Remediation
Upgrade Debian:9
openssl
to version 1.1.0l-1~deb9u1 or higher.
References
- https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1563
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-1563
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/0
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/1
- https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/25
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=08229ad838c50f644d7e928e2eef147b4308ad64
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=631f94db0065c78181ca9ba5546ebc8bb3884b97
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e21f8cf78a125cd3c8c0d1a1a6c8bb0b901f893f
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K97324400?utm_source=f5support&utm_medium=RSS
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2019-09
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4539
- https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4540
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201911-04
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154467/Slackware-Security-Advisory-openssl-Updates.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00026.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0002/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00054.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00072.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00012.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00016.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-1/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4376-2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4504-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-1563
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=08229ad838c50f644d7e928e2eef147b4308ad64
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=631f94db0065c78181ca9ba5546ebc8bb3884b97
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e21f8cf78a125cd3c8c0d1a1a6c8bb0b901f893f
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY6SNRJP2S7Y42GIIDO3HXPNMDYN2U3A/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZN4VVQJ3JDCHGIHV4Y2YTXBYQZ6PWQ7E/
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K97324400?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
On the x86-64 architecture, the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.31 fails to ignore the LD_PREFER_MAP_32BIT_EXEC environment variable during program execution after a security transition, allowing local attackers to restrict the possible mapping addresses for loaded libraries and thus bypass ASLR for a setuid program.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-19126
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4FQ5LC6JOYSOYFPRUZ4S45KL6IP3RPPZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZFJ5E7NWOL6ROE5QVICHKIOUGCPFJVUH/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25204
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1/
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-19126
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4FQ5LC6JOYSOYFPRUZ4S45KL6IP3RPPZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZFJ5E7NWOL6ROE5QVICHKIOUGCPFJVUH/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libsepol/libsepol1
- Introduced through: libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libsepol
package and not the libsepol
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a heap-based buffer over-read in ebitmap_match_any (called indirectly from cil_check_neverallow). This occurs because there is sometimes a lack of checks for invalid statements in an optional block.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libsepol
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-36087
- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32675
- https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-585.yaml
- https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/bad0a746e9f4cf260dedba5828d9645d50176aac
- https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAEN2sdqJKHvDzPnxS-J8grU8fSf32DDtx=kyh84OsCq_Vm+yaQ@mail.gmail.com/T/
- https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/340f0eb7f3673e8aacaf0a96cbfcd4d12a405521
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
- https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAEN2sdqJKHvDzPnxS-J8grU8fSf32DDtx=kyh84OsCq_Vm+yaQ%40mail.gmail.com/T/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libsepol/libsepol1
- Introduced through: libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libsepol
package and not the libsepol
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a use-after-free in __cil_verify_classperms (called from __cil_verify_classpermission and __cil_pre_verify_helper).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libsepol
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-36084
- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=31065
- https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-417.yaml
- https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/f34d3d30c8325e4847a6b696fe7a3936a8a361f3
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libsepol/libsepol1
- Introduced through: libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libsepol
package and not the libsepol
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a use-after-free in __cil_verify_classperms (called from __verify_map_perm_classperms and hashtab_map).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libsepol
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-36085
- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=31124
- https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-421.yaml
- https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/2d35fcc7e9e976a2346b1de20e54f8663e8a6cba
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: libsepol/libsepol1
- Introduced through: libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › libsepol/libsepol1@2.6-2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream libsepol
package and not the libsepol
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a use-after-free in cil_reset_classpermission (called from cil_reset_classperms_set and cil_reset_classperms_list).
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
libsepol
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-36086
- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32177
- https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/selinux/OSV-2021-536.yaml
- https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/c49a8ea09501ad66e799ea41b8154b6770fec2c8
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U7ZYR3PIJ75N6U2IONJWCKZ5L2NKJTGR/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: glibc/libc-bin
- Introduced through: glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4, glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4 and others
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc-dev-bin@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/libc6-dev@2.24-11+deb9u4
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › glibc/multiarch-support@2.24-11+deb9u4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream glibc
package and not the glibc
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
The nameserver caching daemon (nscd) in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.29 through 2.33, when processing a request for netgroup lookup, may crash due to a double-free, potentially resulting in degraded service or Denial of Service on the local system. This is related to netgroupcache.c.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
glibc
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-27645
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7LZNT6KTMCCWPWXEOGSHD3YLYZKUGMH5/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I7TS26LIZSOBLGJEZMJX4PXT5BQDE2WS/
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27462
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-07
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00021.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7LZNT6KTMCCWPWXEOGSHD3YLYZKUGMH5/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I7TS26LIZSOBLGJEZMJX4PXT5BQDE2WS/
low severity
- Vulnerable module: systemd/libsystemd0
- Introduced through: systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9 and systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libsystemd0@232-25+deb9u9
-
Introduced through: fluent/fluentd@v0.12-debian-new › systemd/libudev1@232-25+deb9u9
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream systemd
package and not the systemd
package as distributed by Debian
.
See How to fix?
for Debian:9
relevant fixed versions and status.
An issue was discovered in button_open in login/logind-button.c in systemd before 243. When executing the udevadm trigger command, a memory leak may occur.
Remediation
There is no fixed version for Debian:9
systemd
.
References
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-20386
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZPCOMW5X6IZZXASCDD2CNW2DLF3YADC/
- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/b2774a3ae692113e1f47a336a6c09bac9cfb49ad
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200210-0002/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-02/msg00014.html
- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/CVE-2019-20386
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4269-1/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZPCOMW5X6IZZXASCDD2CNW2DLF3YADC/