Vulnerabilities |
5 via 8 paths |
---|---|
Dependencies |
14 |
Source |
Docker |
Target OS |
alpine:3.10.6 |
critical severity
- Vulnerable module: apk-tools/apk-tools
- Introduced through: apk-tools/apk-tools@2.10.4-r2
- Fixed in: 2.10.7-r0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › apk-tools/apk-tools@2.10.4-r2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream apk-tools
package and not the apk-tools
package as distributed by Alpine
.
See How to fix?
for Alpine:3.10
relevant fixed versions and status.
libfetch before 2021-07-26, as used in apk-tools, xbps, and other products, mishandles numeric strings for the FTP and HTTP protocols. The FTP passive mode implementation allows an out-of-bounds read because strtol is used to parse the relevant numbers into address bytes. It does not check if the line ends prematurely. If it does, the for-loop condition checks for the '\0' terminator one byte too late.
Remediation
Upgrade Alpine:3.10
apk-tools
to version 2.10.7-r0 or higher.
References
- https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/commits/main/lib/libfetch
- https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools/-/issues/10749
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc@%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0caeea677af7c27a97111c06ccb7@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0caeea677af7c27a97111c06ccb7@%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0caeea677af7c27a97111c06ccb7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0caeea677af7c27a97111c06ccb7%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E
high severity
- Vulnerable module: apk-tools/apk-tools
- Introduced through: apk-tools/apk-tools@2.10.4-r2
- Fixed in: 2.10.6-r0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › apk-tools/apk-tools@2.10.4-r2
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream apk-tools
package and not the apk-tools
package as distributed by Alpine
.
See How to fix?
for Alpine:3.10
relevant fixed versions and status.
In Alpine Linux apk-tools before 2.12.5, the tarball parser allows a buffer overflow and crash.
Remediation
Upgrade Alpine:3.10
apk-tools
to version 2.10.6-r0 or higher.
References
high severity
- Vulnerable module: busybox/busybox
- Introduced through: busybox/busybox@1.30.1-r4 and busybox/ssl_client@1.30.1-r4
- Fixed in: 1.30.1-r5
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › busybox/busybox@1.30.1-r4
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › busybox/ssl_client@1.30.1-r4
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream busybox
package and not the busybox
package as distributed by Alpine
.
See How to fix?
for Alpine:3.10
relevant fixed versions and status.
decompress_gunzip.c in BusyBox through 1.32.1 mishandles the error bit on the huft_build result pointer, with a resultant invalid free or segmentation fault, via malformed gzip data.
Remediation
Upgrade Alpine:3.10
busybox
to version 1.30.1-r5 or higher.
References
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3UDQGJRECXFS5EZVDH2OI45FMO436AC4/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z7ZIFKPRR32ZYA3WAA2NXFA3QHHOU6FJ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZASBW7QRRLY5V2R44MQ4QQM4CZIDHM2U/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-09
- https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=f25d254dfd4243698c31a4f3153d4ac72aa9e9bd
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00001.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3UDQGJRECXFS5EZVDH2OI45FMO436AC4/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z7ZIFKPRR32ZYA3WAA2NXFA3QHHOU6FJ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZASBW7QRRLY5V2R44MQ4QQM4CZIDHM2U/
high severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl/libcrypto1.1
- Introduced through: openssl/libcrypto1.1@1.1.1j-r0 and openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.1j-r0
- Fixed in: 1.1.1k-r0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › openssl/libcrypto1.1@1.1.1j-r0
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.1j-r0
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Alpine
.
See How to fix?
for Alpine:3.10
relevant fixed versions and status.
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
Remediation
Upgrade Alpine:3.10
openssl
to version 1.1.1k-r0 or higher.
References
- https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10356
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-08
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
medium severity
- Vulnerable module: openssl/libcrypto1.1
- Introduced through: openssl/libcrypto1.1@1.1.1j-r0 and openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.1j-r0
- Fixed in: 1.1.1k-r0
Detailed paths
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › openssl/libcrypto1.1@1.1.1j-r0
-
Introduced through: alpine@3.10.6 › openssl/libssl1.1@1.1.1j-r0
NVD Description
Note: Versions mentioned in the description apply only to the upstream openssl
package and not the openssl
package as distributed by Alpine
.
See How to fix?
for Alpine:3.10
relevant fixed versions and status.
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
Remediation
Upgrade Alpine:3.10
openssl
to version 1.1.1k-r0 or higher.
References
- https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10356
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-06
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
- https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4875
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/08/msg00029.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/