Vulnerabilities

4 via 5 paths

Dependencies

20

Source

GitHub

Commit

4522f536

Find, fix and prevent vulnerabilities in your code.

Severity
  • 4
Status
  • 4
  • 0
  • 0

medium severity
new

Infinite loop

  • Vulnerable module: zipp
  • Introduced through: fake-useragent@1.5.1

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: chrispetrou/FDsploit@chrispetrou/FDsploit#4522f536319b9d6ef802b3b5f0acd91ce129b564 fake-useragent@1.5.1 importlib-metadata@4.13.0 zipp@3.15.0
    Remediation: Upgrade to fake-useragent@1.5.1.
  • Introduced through: chrispetrou/FDsploit@chrispetrou/FDsploit#4522f536319b9d6ef802b3b5f0acd91ce129b564 fake-useragent@1.5.1 importlib-resources@5.12.0 zipp@3.15.0
    Remediation: Upgrade to fake-useragent@1.5.1.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Infinite loop where an attacker can cause the application to stop responding by initiating a loop through functions affecting the Path module, such as joinpath, the overloaded division operator, and iterdir.

Details

Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its intended and legitimate users.

Unlike other vulnerabilities, DoS attacks usually do not aim at breaching security. Rather, they are focused on making websites and services unavailable to genuine users resulting in downtime.

One popular Denial of Service vulnerability is DDoS (a Distributed Denial of Service), an attack that attempts to clog network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines.

When it comes to open source libraries, DoS vulnerabilities allow attackers to trigger such a crash or crippling of the service by using a flaw either in the application code or from the use of open source libraries.

Two common types of DoS vulnerabilities:

  • High CPU/Memory Consumption- An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to take a disproportionate amount of time to process. For example, commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload.

  • Crash - An attacker sending crafted requests that could cause the system to crash. For Example, npm ws package

Remediation

Upgrade zipp to version 3.19.1 or higher.

References

medium severity

Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer

  • Vulnerable module: urllib3
  • Introduced through: requests@2.31.0

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: chrispetrou/FDsploit@chrispetrou/FDsploit#4522f536319b9d6ef802b3b5f0acd91ce129b564 requests@2.31.0 urllib3@2.0.7
    Remediation: Upgrade to requests@2.32.0.

Overview

urllib3 is a HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer due to the improper handling of the Proxy-Authorization header during cross-origin redirects when ProxyManager is not in use. When the conditions below are met, including non-recommended configurations, the contents of this header can be sent in an automatic HTTP redirect.

Notes:

To be vulnerable, the application must be doing all of the following:

  1. Setting the Proxy-Authorization header without using urllib3's built-in proxy support.

  2. Not disabling HTTP redirects (e.g. with redirects=False)

  3. Either not using an HTTPS origin server, or having a proxy or target origin that redirects to a malicious origin.

Workarounds

  1. Using the Proxy-Authorization header with urllib3's ProxyManager.

  2. Disabling HTTP redirects using redirects=False when sending requests.

  3. Not using the Proxy-Authorization header.

Remediation

Upgrade urllib3 to version 1.26.19, 2.2.2 or higher.

References

medium severity

Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

  • Vulnerable module: requests
  • Introduced through: requests@2.31.0

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: chrispetrou/FDsploit@chrispetrou/FDsploit#4522f536319b9d6ef802b3b5f0acd91ce129b564 requests@2.31.0
    Remediation: Upgrade to requests@2.32.2.

Overview

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation when making requests through a Requests Session. An attacker can bypass certificate verification by making the first request with verify=False, causing all subsequent requests to ignore certificate verification regardless of changes to the verify value.

Notes:

  1. For requests <2.32.0, avoid setting verify=False for the first request to a host while using a Requests Session.

  2. For requests <2.32.0, call close() on Session objects to clear existing connections if verify=False is used.

  3. This vulnerability was initially fixed in version 2.32.0, which was yanked. Therefore, the next available fixed version is 2.32.2.

Remediation

Upgrade requests to version 2.32.2 or higher.

References

medium severity

Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

  • Vulnerable module: validators
  • Introduced through: validators@0.20.0

Detailed paths

  • Introduced through: chrispetrou/FDsploit@chrispetrou/FDsploit#4522f536319b9d6ef802b3b5f0acd91ce129b564 validators@0.20.0
    Remediation: Upgrade to validators@0.21.0.

Overview

validators is a package for Python Data Validation for Humans.

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the torbot.modules.validators.validate_link function. An attacker can cause an application crash by using a well-crafted argument. This is due to the use of a regular expression with exponential complexity. An attacker can exploit this by using a well-crafted URL argument, causing a Denial of Service on the system.

Details

Denial of Service (DoS) describes a family of attacks, all aimed at making a system inaccessible to its original and legitimate users. There are many types of DoS attacks, ranging from trying to clog the network pipes to the system by generating a large volume of traffic from many machines (a Distributed Denial of Service - DDoS - attack) to sending crafted requests that cause a system to crash or take a disproportional amount of time to process.

The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't very intuitive and can ultimately end up making it easy for attackers to take your site down.

Let’s take the following regular expression as an example:

regex = /A(B|C+)+D/

This regular expression accomplishes the following:

  • A The string must start with the letter 'A'
  • (B|C+)+ The string must then follow the letter A with either the letter 'B' or some number of occurrences of the letter 'C' (the + matches one or more times). The + at the end of this section states that we can look for one or more matches of this section.
  • D Finally, we ensure this section of the string ends with a 'D'

The expression would match inputs such as ABBD, ABCCCCD, ABCBCCCD and ACCCCCD

It most cases, it doesn't take very long for a regex engine to find a match:

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCD")'
0.04s user 0.01s system 95% cpu 0.052 total

$ time node -e '/A(B|C+)+D/.test("ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCX")'
1.79s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1.812 total

The entire process of testing it against a 30 characters long string takes around ~52ms. But when given an invalid string, it takes nearly two seconds to complete the test, over ten times as long as it took to test a valid string. The dramatic difference is due to the way regular expressions get evaluated.

Most Regex engines will work very similarly (with minor differences). The engine will match the first possible way to accept the current character and proceed to the next one. If it then fails to match the next one, it will backtrack and see if there was another way to digest the previous character. If it goes too far down the rabbit hole only to find out the string doesn’t match in the end, and if many characters have multiple valid regex paths, the number of backtracking steps can become very large, resulting in what is known as catastrophic backtracking.

Let's look at how our expression runs into this problem, using a shorter string: "ACCCX". While it seems fairly straightforward, there are still four different ways that the engine could match those three C's:

  1. CCC
  2. CC+C
  3. C+CC
  4. C+C+C.

The engine has to try each of those combinations to see if any of them potentially match against the expression. When you combine that with the other steps the engine must take, we can use RegEx 101 debugger to see the engine has to take a total of 38 steps before it can determine the string doesn't match.

From there, the number of steps the engine must use to validate a string just continues to grow.

String Number of C's Number of steps
ACCCX 3 38
ACCCCX 4 71
ACCCCCX 5 136
ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCX 14 65,553

By the time the string includes 14 C's, the engine has to take over 65,000 steps just to see if the string is valid. These extreme situations can cause them to work very slowly (exponentially related to input size, as shown above), allowing an attacker to exploit this and can cause the service to excessively consume CPU, resulting in a Denial of Service.

Remediation

Upgrade validators to version 0.21.0 or higher.

References