Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix transactionRoot -> transactionsRoot in BlockHeader #5083

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jul 4, 2022

Conversation

OscBacon
Copy link

@OscBacon OscBacon commented May 26, 2022

Description

Fix transactionRoot -> transactionsRoot in BlockHeader

Fixes #4871

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Note: only changing the interface

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

@nikoulai εδώ είναι!

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

Also note, I ran a quick grep -r and there's no reference in the repo to transaction(s)Root :)

Copy link

@vcheeney vcheeney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Encountered the same problem. Would have made the same change. 👍

@vcheeney
Copy link

@OscBacon I encountered the same problem. Thanks for creating this PR. Would really like this merged 👍

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

No problem @vcheeney !
@nikoulai, could you please give the second thumbs up?

@jdevcs jdevcs mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2022
14 tasks
@jdevcs jdevcs added the 1.x 1.0 related issues label Jun 9, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@nazarhussain nazarhussain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add entry to CHANGELOG.md

@nazarhussain nazarhussain added Types Incorrect or missing types Review Needed Maintainer(s) need to review labels Jun 22, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 22, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2608297579

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 72.004%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2596319045: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3388
Relevant Lines: 4430

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@avkos avkos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add comments to CHANGELOG.md

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

@avkos ? where in the file? and with or without a version tag?

@nikoulai
Copy link
Contributor

@OscBacon Hi,
you will find CHANGELOG.md at the root of the repo. You can mention your change under 1.7.5 with a reference to the issue. Take as example the other comments.

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

@nikoulai Done! Please merge whenever you can!

@nikoulai
Copy link
Contributor

@OscBacon Looks good.

Have to wait for changes to be approved.
cc @nazarhussain

@OscBacon
Copy link
Author

Hey @nazarhussain, @jdevcs, @nikoulai: could one of you authorize the merge now please? :)

@nazarhussain nazarhussain added Future Release For future release. and removed Review Needed Maintainer(s) need to review labels Jul 1, 2022
@jdevcs jdevcs changed the base branch from 1.x to junaid/txrootfix July 4, 2022 13:00
@jdevcs jdevcs merged commit 4b6e9ec into web3:junaid/txrootfix Jul 4, 2022
@jdevcs jdevcs mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2022
16 tasks
jdevcs added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2022
* Fix transactionRoot -> transactionsRoot in BlockHeader

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Nikos Iliakis <nikoulai@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Junaid <86780488+jdevcs@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oscar Baracos <oscar.baracos@gmail.com>
@jdevcs
Copy link
Contributor

jdevcs commented Jul 4, 2022

Merged via #5197

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.x 1.0 related issues Future Release For future release. Types Incorrect or missing types
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mismatched interface
7 participants