You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Within Libraries.io we’ve aggregated 1,142,594 projects, written in 160 languages from across 29 package managers, including dependencies, releases, license information and source code repository infomation. This results in a rich index of almost every open source library available for use today.
The index is kept up to date with information about new libraries and new releases of existing libraries every day. This ensures upcoming projects get exposure, as well as existing well known libraries."
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Qix- npm only counts published modules using chalk. I think Libraries.io also counts web apps and other things published on GitHub with a package.json, but not published on npm.
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ that's the emoji I was looking for but it didn't show up in my emoji palette D:
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are even if the numbers of libraries.io are correct: https://libraries.io/npm/chalk
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@4kochi do those numbers include something other than NPM?
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure.
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Within Libraries.io we’ve aggregated 1,142,594 projects, written in 160 languages from across 29 package managers, including dependencies, releases, license information and source code repository infomation. This results in a rich index of almost every open source library available for use today.
The index is kept up to date with information about new libraries and new releases of existing libraries every day. This ensures upcoming projects get exposure, as well as existing well known libraries."
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is in fact a distinction between npm modules and github repositories (projects vs repositories)
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, but I wonder what other managers Chalk is on other than NPM. Interesting!
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Qix- npm only counts published modules using
chalk. I think Libraries.io also counts web apps and other things published on GitHub with a package.json, but not published on npm.51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha. Neat! Should we be using those numbers? Or NPM's? I've been going off of NPMs the last few times I updated.
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's go off npm since that's what everyone else is doing.
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
51b8f32There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 woot!