Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(server): support socket path in server config #389

Merged

Conversation

MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor

@MaximeHeckel MaximeHeckel commented Jul 24, 2020

Fixes #385

  • Add sqlSocketPath option support in the config
  • Validate config UX with project maintainers
  • Add tests for new socket path option in config (Looking for guidance here 馃槃 )
  • Mention sqlSocketPath in docs/configuration.md

As mentioned in the ticket, my team and I were looking to set up lighthouse-ci server on Google Cloud Run (serverless containers) with a Google Cloud SQL database (Postgres) and our only possibility to link the two was to use a socket path instead of a connection URL.

Let me know what you think of this config, there's probably a few things that still need to be done or validated in terms of how you want the config to look like.
Also @patrickhulce mentioned that testing might be quite hard for this one, so I'm looking for any proposal on how I could tackle this 馃槃

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

馃摑 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it! and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

鈩癸笍 Googlers: Go here for more info.

@MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@googlebot I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

鈩癸笍 Googlers: Go here for more info.

Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

impl looks good to me! want to create another copy of mysql or postgres server test suite that uses an environment variable for the socket path to use?

it would look pretty similar to https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci/blob/master/packages/server/test/mysql-server.test.js just with your new sqlSocketPath option

docs/configuration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/server/src/api/storage/sql/sql.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@patrickhulce thank you for the suggestions! Will address the comments and add tests

@MaximeHeckel MaximeHeckel force-pushed the support-socket-path-config branch 6 times, most recently from 365619c to ffe5500 Compare July 27, 2020 15:24
@MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@patrickhulce maybe you have a bit more context regarding how to use the mysql service with Github Actions but I currently don't seem to have permissions to connect through socket path in CI / Linux:
SequelizeConnectionError: connect EACCES /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

maybe you have a bit more context regarding how to use the mysql service with Github Actions but I currently don't seem to have permissions to connect through socket path in CI / Linux

Well we'll need to start another copy of mysql that exposes the socket path, right now it's just running in a docker container on port 33306, so that socket file won't exist.

Looks like it's not too bad though https://superuser.com/questions/1411402/how-to-expose-linux-socket-file-from-docker-container-mysql-mariadb-etc-to

So steps...

  1. We create a copy of the mysql entry currently under services but have it use a socket instead.
  2. Expose the socket folder to the host image like the answer linked above
  3. Do the same steps for creating our test database like we do for the port-based on but using the host socket file.
  4. Set the environment variable like you do now to get the tests to use this socket file.

@MaximeHeckel MaximeHeckel force-pushed the support-socket-path-config branch 15 times, most recently from 885a79b to 79fb77a Compare July 27, 2020 22:50
@@ -74,12 +89,17 @@ jobs:
echo "::set-env name=CHROME_PATH::$(which google-chrome-stable)"
echo "::set-env name=POSTGRES_DB_URL::postgres://postgres:postgres@localhost/lighthouse_ci_test"
echo "::set-env name=MYSQL_DB_URL::mysql://root:mysql@127.0.0.1:33306/lighthouse_ci_test"
echo "::set-env name=MYSQL_SOCKET_PATH::/mnt/mysqld.sock"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fyi @MaximeHeckel you might want to create subdirs so the docker mount doesn't try to clobber an existing directory with the mount I don't think setting /mnt for both postgres and mysql will work

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry this is such a pain to debug 馃槄

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you might want to create subdirs so the docker mount doesn't try to clobber an existing directory

Yeah ran into that issue originally with /tmp

sorry this is such a pain to debug 馃槄

and haha no worries I'm used to use gh action and spending hours of trial and error until a workflow works

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a way wit gh actions to create the directories before the service starts? I believe the directories of the host need to be present before the service start right?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm I'm not sure to be honest. I would assume there should be but I haven't tried before

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did a bit of investigation yesterday night, it doesn't look like it's possible sadly. (Couldn't find a lot of documentations around volumes, tried to work around it but didn't find any satisfying solution to this)
What we can do maybe is use another path than /mnt? Do you have any suggestions? (I tried /tmp as well but yarn wouldn't be able to successfully run after putting the sockets there)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have you tried using the workspace dir yet? something like ${{ github.workspace }}/mysql:/var/run/mysqld? we just need it to be predictable and accessible

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just gave it a try, but like in the previous attempt the mysqlsocket service doesn't seem to be able to start: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci/pull/389/checks?check_run_id=919336503

@MaximeHeckel MaximeHeckel force-pushed the support-socket-path-config branch 2 times, most recently from dc2b2cf to 62574f7 Compare July 28, 2020 14:36
@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Oof, yeah this is really rough @MaximeHeckel I'm about to give up as well 鈽癸笍 https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci/actions

I'm inclined to just skip the test here at this point since there's not explicit configuration involved if things are working on your end. sockets through docker just seem rough :/

leave the test file in play at least and maybe I'll play around with github actions some more on the subject later. just remove the environment variable for now in the github actions config I guess

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

@googlebot I consent.

@MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

MaximeHeckel commented Jul 28, 2020

I'm inclined to just skip the test here at this point since there's not explicit configuration involved if things are working on your end. sockets through docker just seem rough :/

yeah not an easy one (funny thing is that I used to work for Docker, and I remember struggling as much back then, seems that things haven't improved)

just remove the environment variable for now in the github actions config I guess

Will do that right now

The tests were passing and locally I didn't have any issues
For reference here's the Github Action to prove it 馃槃 both Postgres and Mysql working through socket: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse-ci/actions/runs/184918838

...
2020-07-27T22:59:11.7719998Z PASS packages/server/test/postgres-socket-path-server.test.js (7.029s)
...
2020-07-27T22:59:17.7798161Z PASS packages/server/test/mysql-socket-path-server.test.js (12.73s)
...

@MaximeHeckel MaximeHeckel marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2020 22:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh wait you got it working!? That's amazing! Ignore my removal comment if you fixed it I thought we were stuck in failing limbo :)

thank you very much for your effort here! 馃帀

happy to do it in a followup though if you're just done with this PR 馃槅

@MaximeHeckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh wait you got it working!? That's amazing! Ignore my removal comment if you fixed it I thought we were stuck in failing limbo :)

Oh sorry, I might have caused some confusion here:

  • I got it working locally
  • I got it working if mounting a volume in /mnt for example (that's where the logs you see in my previous come from, and that's where the run I linked in that same comment points to)

But like we investigated yesterday, we couldn't get it to work by mounting a volume in /mnt/mysql or /mnt/postgres because we can't create the folder before these services start.

As it stands now this PR has the tests for both mysql and postgres socket path but they are just not running because like you suggested I removed the environment variable for their respective socket paths and thus the tests are skipped.

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah ok gotcha 馃憤

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adding support for socket path
3 participants